Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 24, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comTo keep employees safe and avoid liability from distracted driving, businesses should consider adopting comprehensive cell phone policies.
As a reminder about how dangerous distracted driving can be, it’s important to look at the statistics. In 2013, 3,154 people were killed and 424,000 were injured in motor vehicle crashes involving distracted drivers. The National Safety Council (NSC) estimates that one-quarter of all crashes involve cell phones.
Despite the risks, many drivers still don’t put down their phones while driving. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) estimates that at any given daylight moment across America, approximately 660,000 drivers are using cell phones or manipulating electronic devices while driving.
While they are more prone to cell phone use behind the wheel, teens are not the only offenders. With the growing popularity of smartphones, employees frequently conduct business outside of the office. In fact, a recent NHTSA survey found that drivers cite work-related communications as a reason to use phones while driving.
Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, an employer may be held legally accountable for the negligence of its employee, if the employee was acting within the scope of his or her employment at the time of a driving accident.
As highlighted by the NSC, one company paid $24.7 million after a tractor-trailer driver ran into ten vehicles while reading a text message. Another paid $16.1 million when a salesperson who was talking on a cell phone while in route to a meeting crashed and injured another driver.
Of course, simply having a policy in place is not enough to avoid liability. Businesses must also train employees about the importance of safe driving, monitor compliance, and strictly enforce violations.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!