Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Ponzi Scheme Victims Receive 4 Cents on the Dollar from Lou Pearlman Following His Bankruptcy
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: July 9, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Lou Pearlman may be known by many as the creator of teen sensation boy bands ‘N Sync and the Backstreet Boys, but to thousands of mom-and-pop investors, he will forever be known as the Ponzi schemer who scammed them out of millions. What’s worse, bankruptcy trustee Soneet Kapila recently made public that, following a liquidation settlement of the former producer’s assets, Ponzi scheme victims will receive an initial payout of no more than 4 cents on the dollar.
Pearlman is currently serving a 25-year prison sentence for devising a Ponzi scheme that cheated investors out of more than $300 million. Since Pearlman’s conviction and his petition for bankruptcy law protection in 2007, Kapila has recovered roughly $35 million from asset sales, royalty payments, and lawsuit settlements. However, the bulk of this amount will be extended to secured creditors. According to the settlement plan Kapila filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Orlando, roughly $25 million of the recovered amount will go toward secured creditors and to cover attorney’s fees.
The remaining $10 million will be divided among unsecured creditors – who lost roughly $260 million. This could amount to a payout of roughly $4,000 for a $100,000 loss, the Tampa Bay Times reports. A committee of unsecured creditors is urging the victims to accept the terms, stressing that fighting the plan could result in further delays in the six-year-long struggle. Kapila also defended the settlement, arguing that, were it not for the banks’ choosing to waive tens of millions of dollars in claims, and the IRS accepting a reduced amount, the victims might have walked away with nothing.
“It’s been a case where myself [sic] and my professional team has [sic] been willing to hang in there and take a lot of risk on fees (being reimbursed at all) because there was no money to pay anyone,” Kapila told the Times. “This case required quantum effort.”
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk
For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress
Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey
For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.