Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Ponzi Scheme Victims Receive 4 Cents on the Dollar from Lou Pearlman Following His Bankruptcy
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: July 9, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Lou Pearlman may be known by many as the creator of teen sensation boy bands ‘N Sync and the Backstreet Boys, but to thousands of mom-and-pop investors, he will forever be known as the Ponzi schemer who scammed them out of millions. What’s worse, bankruptcy trustee Soneet Kapila recently made public that, following a liquidation settlement of the former producer’s assets, Ponzi scheme victims will receive an initial payout of no more than 4 cents on the dollar.
Pearlman is currently serving a 25-year prison sentence for devising a Ponzi scheme that cheated investors out of more than $300 million. Since Pearlman’s conviction and his petition for bankruptcy law protection in 2007, Kapila has recovered roughly $35 million from asset sales, royalty payments, and lawsuit settlements. However, the bulk of this amount will be extended to secured creditors. According to the settlement plan Kapila filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Orlando, roughly $25 million of the recovered amount will go toward secured creditors and to cover attorney’s fees.
The remaining $10 million will be divided among unsecured creditors – who lost roughly $260 million. This could amount to a payout of roughly $4,000 for a $100,000 loss, the Tampa Bay Times reports. A committee of unsecured creditors is urging the victims to accept the terms, stressing that fighting the plan could result in further delays in the six-year-long struggle. Kapila also defended the settlement, arguing that, were it not for the banks’ choosing to waive tens of millions of dollars in claims, and the IRS accepting a reduced amount, the victims might have walked away with nothing.
“It’s been a case where myself [sic] and my professional team has [sic] been willing to hang in there and take a lot of risk on fees (being reimbursed at all) because there was no money to pay anyone,” Kapila told the Times. “This case required quantum effort.”
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce
The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel
10 Common Issues in Franchise Disputes
The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman
Reputational Risk and Legal Exposure: Why New Jersey Businesses Must Manage Them Together
New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
Eviction Is Not Always the End: Understanding Post-Possession Rent Claims in New Jersey and New York
No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
Company Dissolved? Legal and Financial Consequences to Expect
A company is dissolved; legally, it ceases to exist. Accordingly, dissolution results in significant legal and financial consequences. It is a process that must be properly managed to avoid continuing liability. The Corporate Dissolution Process Corporate dissolution is the legal process of formally closing a corporation, paying its debts and distributing the remaining assets. Most […]
Author: Jay McDaniel
The Legal Implications of Signing a Triple Net Lease
A triple net lease is a commercial lease in which the tenant pays the property’s real estate taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs, known as the three nets, in addition to base rent. They are most often used in freestanding retail and office buildings and in large single-tenant industrial properties, with terms that typically run 10 […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.