Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 15, 2022
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comOn January 13, 2022, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (Chamber) joined the rallying call for a federal privacy law. The Chamber sent a letter to Congress calling on lawmakers to enact federal privacy legislation. The letter was joined by local business groups from across the country and argued that comprehensive privacy legislation is necessary to address the growing patchwork of state laws.
“We, the undersigned, urge Congress to pass comprehensive privacy legislation. It has been 1,285 days since the California Consumer Privacy Act, America’s first comprehensive data protection law, was signed,” the letter states. “Consumers and businesses should not be forced to wait longer for legislation that equally protects the privacy of all Americans.”
Congress has considered several federal data privacy bills in recent years. However, none have gained enough bipartisan support to become law. In an April 2020 report, the Congressional Research Service found that the bills introduced in the 116th Congress shared several common elements in that each regulates the use of personal information by: (1) recognizing individuals’ rights to control their personal information; (2) requiring a defined class of entities to take steps to respect those rights; and (3) creating procedures to enforce those requirements. In most cases, prior federal privacy bills were derailed when lawmakers couldn’t agree who should enforce the law and whether more restrictive state laws should be preempted. The main sticking point, both on federal and state levels, continues to be whether to provide a private cause of action to individuals affected by a cybersecurity incident.
In the absence of a federal data privacy standard, states have enacted their own laws. Signed into law in 2018 and made effective January 1, 2020, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA) grants consumers the right to request that a business to disclose how it uses their personal information. It also includes a number of other data protections for consumers, including the right to request deletion of personal information and the right to opt out of the sale of personal information by a business. The law is scheduled for an overhaul next year pursuant to the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), which will impose more stringent data privacy requirements and will become effective on January 1, 2023.
Virginia was one of several states to approve a comprehensive data privacy law in 2021. The Consumer Data Protection Act (CDPA), which incorporates elements of the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), as well as California’s CCPA and CPRA, will go into effect on January 1, 2023. Notably, the CDPA does not include a private right of action. Colorado adopted a similar law in 2021. Its comprehensive data privacy legislation, the Colorado Privacy Act, is also slated to take effect in 2023. To date, twenty-six other states and the District of Columbia have also considered data protection legislation.
In its letter, the Chamber highlighted that while many state data privacy laws share similarities to the CCPA and the GDPR, they also differ in their scope, duties, and enforcement, which causes significant compliance challenges for businesses. The Chamber also argued that establishing a unified, national standard would benefit both businesses and the public, writing:
Data is foundational to America’s economic growth and keeping society safe, healthy and inclusive. Technologies like artificial intelligence are leading to vaccine development and expanding opportunities financially to those who have traditionally been underserved. Fundamental to the use of data is trust. A national privacy law that is clear and fair to business and empowering to consumers will foster the digital ecosystem necessary for America to compete.
In addition to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the letter was signed by local chambers of commerce from Arizona, California, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Texas, Illinois, Georgia, Indiana, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Utah, Washington and several other states. The coalition also included the Association of National Advertisers, TechNet, National Business Coalition on E-Commerce and Privacy, National Association of Federally-Insured Credit Unions and the Foodservice Equipment Distributors Association.
As the Chamber highlighted in its letter, the patchwork of state-level regulations poses significant challenges for businesses. At this point, it is unclear if 2022 is the year that Congress finally pushes a federal privacy bill across the finish line. Accordingly, it imperative to stay on top of this rapidly evolving area of law.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Maryam Meseha, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!