Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Brexit Uncertainty Leading to IP Challenges

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: July 19, 2019

Key Contacts

Back

The UK is Preparing for the Possibility of a No-Deal Brexit and has Issued Guidance Regarding How Intellectual Property Rights may be Impacted

It is unclear when the United Kingdom will leave the European Union, as European leaders recently extended the Brexit deadline to October 31, 2019. The UK also retained the option to leave sooner.

Brexit Uncertainty Leading to Intellectual Property Challenges

To date, the country’s Parliament has refused to ratify the terms of withdrawal, which could result in a “no-deal Brexit.” The lack of a withdrawal agreement calls into question whether there will still be a transition period in which the status quo is maintained with respect to intellectual property rights.

Not surprisingly, businesses that operate in the UK are wondering what to do next. The good news is that the UK is preparing for the possibility of a no-deal Brexit and has issued guidance regarding how intellectual property rights may be impacted. This post offers a brief summary.

Protecting Trademarks in the UK

Under Title IV of the Withdrawal Agreement, all existing registered EU trademarks and registered Community designs will continue to cover the UK during any transition period. After the transition period expires or in the event of a no-deal Brexit, such rights will continue to be protected and to be enforceable in the UK, as the country intends to provide an equivalent trademark or design registered in the UK. As detailed in guidance by the UK government, the new UK equivalent right will come into force at the point of the UK’s exit from the EU and will be provided with “minimal administrative burden,” i.e. no filing requirement.

Additionally, the trademark or design will subsequently be treated as if it had been applied for and registered under UK law. Accordingly, it will be subject to renewal in the UK, can form the basis for proceedings before the UK Courts and the Intellectual Property Office’s Tribunal, and can be assigned and licensed independently from the EU right.

After the UK leaves the EU, entities with pending  EU trademark and Community design applications must refile with the UK’s Intellectual Property Office and pay the associated filing fees. For a period of nine months from the exit, the UK government will recognize filing dates and claims to earlier priority and UK seniority recorded on the corresponding EU applications. To ensure continued protection, these same provisions will apply to international trademark registrations designating the EU filed with the World Intellectual Property Organization through the Madrid and Hague Systems.

Protecting Patents in the UK

Patent owners won’t see as many changes if there is no Brexit deal because very few areas of UK patent law are based on EU legislation. Supplementary protection certificates for patented pharmaceutical products and agrochemicals are one notable exception. The good news is that all EU legislation governing supplementary protection certificates will remain in force. Going forward, this law, along with the existing supporting provisions in UK patent legislation, will form the UK’s own supplementary protection certificate regime, according to guidance from the UK government.

Protecting Copyrights in the UK

The majority of the UK’s copyright treaties exist independent of the EU and will remain unchanged. However, the EU has developed copyright laws and related rights that extend beyond the provisions of the international treaties, including several cross-border copyright mechanisms. On exit, the UK will be treated by the EU and European Economic Area (EEA) as a non- party to these treaties, and the reciprocal element of these mechanisms will cease to apply to the UK. These changes will primarily impact UK businesses and not those based in the United States.

Domain Names Post Brexit

EURid, which manages .eu domain names, has also published guidance regarding what will happen in a no-deal Brexit scenario. In essence, entities based in the UK will cease to be eligible to register or renew .eu domain names because they will no longer reside in or be established in the EU.

Existing UK registrants of .eu domain names will have two months to update their contact details to either establish an EU address or to transfer their domain names to an EU resident. Thereafter, all registrants that do not reestablish their eligibility will be deemed ineligible, and their domain names will be withdrawn. A withdrawn domain name no longer functions and can no longer support any active services (such as websites or email). However, the record will remain in the .eu registry database and may be reactivated if the eligibility criteria are satisfied.

EURid previously posted timelines that were based on the UK leaving the EU on March 30, which did not occur. Given that the deadline has been extended, EURid published the following notice:

Due to ongoing uncertainties over the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union, EURid has placed on hold any plan regarding domain names registered to individuals and undertakings located in the United Kingdom and Gibraltar.

Accordingly, this is yet another area that will require monitoring as the October 31 deadline approaches.

Next Steps to Protect Your IP Rights

If your business currently or expects to do business in the UK, it is important to understand the implications of the country leaving the European Union and the possibility of a no-deal Brexit. While many questions remain unanswered, there are steps you can take to protect your rights. Many companies are already filing separate U.K. and E.U. trademark applications for insurance purpose. To decide the best course of action, we recommend consulting with an intellectual property attorney who has experience managing intellectual property portfolios on the international level.

If you have any questions, please contact us

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, David Einhorn, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable? post image

Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?"
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery post image

How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery"
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore post image

The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore"
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers post image

BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers"
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected? post image

IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?"
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next post image

Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!