In the wake of a congressional report revealing high levels of heavy toxic metal contamination in several brands of popular baby food, class-action lawsuits are mounting...
In the wake of a congressional report revealing high levels of heavy toxic metal contamination in several brands of popular baby food, class-action lawsuits are mounting. Most recently, several plaintiffs filed suit against Gerber Products Company in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.
House Subcommittee Report on Baby Food
In February, the U.S. House of Representative’s Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy issued a report, entitled “Baby Foods Are Tainted with Dangerous Levels of Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury.”The report concluded that many commercial baby foods are tainted with significant levels of toxic heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury. “Exposure to toxic heavy metals causes permanent decreases in IQ, diminished future economic productivity, and increased risk of future criminal and antisocial behavior in children,” the report stated. “Toxic heavy metals endanger infant neurological development and long-term brain function.”
The report recommended that baby food manufacturers should be required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to test their finished products for toxic heavy metals and be required by the FDA to report levels of toxic heavy metals on food labels. The subcommittee also advised that the FDA should set maximum levels of toxic heavy metals permitted in baby foods.
Class-Action Suit Against Gerber Products
Gerber Products (Gerber) is one of several baby food manufacturers facing consumer class-action lawsuits alleging that the company’s baby food products contain unsafe levels of toxic heavy metals. According to media reports, nearly 70 lawsuits have been filed to date.
In Wallace et al. v. Gerber Products Company, the plaintiffs allege that Gerber has engaged in deceptive trade practices with respect to the marketing and sale of its baby food products (the “Baby Foods”) by failing to disclose that they contain levels of toxic heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury.
According to the lawsuit, “Gerber claims on its website that ‘We have among the strictest standards in the world. From farm to highchair, we go through over 100 quality checks for every jar.’ However, the plaintiffs allege that “Gerber’s packaging labels do not list, let alone warn, potential customers that the Gerber Baby Food Products contain toxic heavy metals.” The suit includes claims for consumer fraud, breach of warranty, and unjust enrichment. It seeks damages, as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. In support of the claims, the complaint cites the House Subcommittee Report, which found that Gerber “demonstrated its willingness to use ingredients that contained dangerous lead levels.”
Beech-Nut and Campbell Soup Company, the maker of Plum Organics baby food, are facing similar lawsuits. In defense of the suits, the manufacturers maintain that their products meet or exceed acceptable levels of heavy metals. With no federal standards for baby food, the companies point to those set by states like California, the European Union, and the World Health Organization.
“Given the lack of specific FDA guidance on baby food, Campbell used standards from California’s Proposition 65, the EU and the WHO, along with general guidance from the FDA on lead not specific to baby foods—to develop a testing protocol for evaluating whether heavy metals in Plum Organics’ products exceeded levels that independent authorities had determined to be acceptable,” Campbell said in a statement.
A Gerber spokesman said that the company’s baby food is safe, and that babies’ health and nutrition remain their priority.
Baby Food Safety Act of 2021
In the wake of the report, Congress introduced the Baby Food Safety Act of 2021. To address heavy metals in baby foods, the proposed bill would require manufacturers and the FDA to take the following actions:
Set maximum levels of inorganic arsenic (10 ppb, 15 ppb for cereal), lead (5 ppb, 10 ppb for cereal), cadmium (5 ppb, 10 ppb for cereal), and mercury (2 ppb) allowed in baby food that manufacturers would have to meet within one year.
Require those levels to be lowered further within two years through FDA guidance, and again after three years through regulation.
Require manufacturers to test their final products – not just ingredients – for toxic heavy metals.
Require manufacturers to post the results of their product testing online twice per year.
Establish a public awareness campaign through the CDC to highlight the risks posed by toxic heavy metals in baby food.
Authorize $50 million for research on agricultural methods of reducing toxic heavy metals in crops.
FDA “Closer to Zero” Baby Food Action Plan
The FDA has also committed to taking regulatory action. On April 8, 2021, it released an action plan for baby foods called “Closer to Zero,” which lays out the agency’s approach to reducing exposure to toxic elements in foods commonly eaten by babies and young children to the lowest possible levels.
“We recognize that Americans want zero toxic elements in the foods eaten by their babies and young children. In reality, because these elements occur in our air, water and soil, there are limits to how low these levels can be. The FDA’s goal, therefore, is to reduce the levels of arsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury in these foods to the greatest extent possible,” the FDA stated. “We are also sensitive to the fact that requiring levels that are not currently feasible could result in significant reductions in the availability of nutritious, affordable foods that many families rely on for their children. Our plan, therefore, outlines a multi-phase, science-based, iterative approach to achieving our goal of getting levels of toxic elements in foods closer to zero over time.”
The FDA’s action plan includes several phases and will be carried out over the next three years. The plan calls for the FDA to evaluate the scientific basis for action levels in consultation with stakeholders; set action levels; encourage adoption of best practices by the industry; and monitor progress.
Key Takeaway
In the absence of federally mandated thresholds for heavy metals, baby food manufacturers are likely to continue to face consumer lawsuits. The good news for all parties is that the Congressional report on heavy metals in baby food may have prompted the FDA to finally establish much-needed action levels.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact us: David Einhorn, Pat McNamara, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Baby Food Companies Face Class Action Suits Regarding Toxic Chemicals
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
In the wake of a congressional report revealing high levels of heavy toxic metal contamination in several brands of popular baby food, class-action lawsuits are mounting...
In the wake of a congressional report revealing high levels of heavy toxic metal contamination in several brands of popular baby food, class-action lawsuits are mounting. Most recently, several plaintiffs filed suit against Gerber Products Company in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.
House Subcommittee Report on Baby Food
In February, the U.S. House of Representative’s Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy issued a report, entitled “Baby Foods Are Tainted with Dangerous Levels of Arsenic, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury.”The report concluded that many commercial baby foods are tainted with significant levels of toxic heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury. “Exposure to toxic heavy metals causes permanent decreases in IQ, diminished future economic productivity, and increased risk of future criminal and antisocial behavior in children,” the report stated. “Toxic heavy metals endanger infant neurological development and long-term brain function.”
The report recommended that baby food manufacturers should be required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to test their finished products for toxic heavy metals and be required by the FDA to report levels of toxic heavy metals on food labels. The subcommittee also advised that the FDA should set maximum levels of toxic heavy metals permitted in baby foods.
Class-Action Suit Against Gerber Products
Gerber Products (Gerber) is one of several baby food manufacturers facing consumer class-action lawsuits alleging that the company’s baby food products contain unsafe levels of toxic heavy metals. According to media reports, nearly 70 lawsuits have been filed to date.
In Wallace et al. v. Gerber Products Company, the plaintiffs allege that Gerber has engaged in deceptive trade practices with respect to the marketing and sale of its baby food products (the “Baby Foods”) by failing to disclose that they contain levels of toxic heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury.
According to the lawsuit, “Gerber claims on its website that ‘We have among the strictest standards in the world. From farm to highchair, we go through over 100 quality checks for every jar.’ However, the plaintiffs allege that “Gerber’s packaging labels do not list, let alone warn, potential customers that the Gerber Baby Food Products contain toxic heavy metals.” The suit includes claims for consumer fraud, breach of warranty, and unjust enrichment. It seeks damages, as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. In support of the claims, the complaint cites the House Subcommittee Report, which found that Gerber “demonstrated its willingness to use ingredients that contained dangerous lead levels.”
Beech-Nut and Campbell Soup Company, the maker of Plum Organics baby food, are facing similar lawsuits. In defense of the suits, the manufacturers maintain that their products meet or exceed acceptable levels of heavy metals. With no federal standards for baby food, the companies point to those set by states like California, the European Union, and the World Health Organization.
“Given the lack of specific FDA guidance on baby food, Campbell used standards from California’s Proposition 65, the EU and the WHO, along with general guidance from the FDA on lead not specific to baby foods—to develop a testing protocol for evaluating whether heavy metals in Plum Organics’ products exceeded levels that independent authorities had determined to be acceptable,” Campbell said in a statement.
A Gerber spokesman said that the company’s baby food is safe, and that babies’ health and nutrition remain their priority.
Baby Food Safety Act of 2021
In the wake of the report, Congress introduced the Baby Food Safety Act of 2021. To address heavy metals in baby foods, the proposed bill would require manufacturers and the FDA to take the following actions:
Set maximum levels of inorganic arsenic (10 ppb, 15 ppb for cereal), lead (5 ppb, 10 ppb for cereal), cadmium (5 ppb, 10 ppb for cereal), and mercury (2 ppb) allowed in baby food that manufacturers would have to meet within one year.
Require those levels to be lowered further within two years through FDA guidance, and again after three years through regulation.
Require manufacturers to test their final products – not just ingredients – for toxic heavy metals.
Require manufacturers to post the results of their product testing online twice per year.
Establish a public awareness campaign through the CDC to highlight the risks posed by toxic heavy metals in baby food.
Authorize $50 million for research on agricultural methods of reducing toxic heavy metals in crops.
FDA “Closer to Zero” Baby Food Action Plan
The FDA has also committed to taking regulatory action. On April 8, 2021, it released an action plan for baby foods called “Closer to Zero,” which lays out the agency’s approach to reducing exposure to toxic elements in foods commonly eaten by babies and young children to the lowest possible levels.
“We recognize that Americans want zero toxic elements in the foods eaten by their babies and young children. In reality, because these elements occur in our air, water and soil, there are limits to how low these levels can be. The FDA’s goal, therefore, is to reduce the levels of arsenic, lead, cadmium and mercury in these foods to the greatest extent possible,” the FDA stated. “We are also sensitive to the fact that requiring levels that are not currently feasible could result in significant reductions in the availability of nutritious, affordable foods that many families rely on for their children. Our plan, therefore, outlines a multi-phase, science-based, iterative approach to achieving our goal of getting levels of toxic elements in foods closer to zero over time.”
The FDA’s action plan includes several phases and will be carried out over the next three years. The plan calls for the FDA to evaluate the scientific basis for action levels in consultation with stakeholders; set action levels; encourage adoption of best practices by the industry; and monitor progress.
Key Takeaway
In the absence of federally mandated thresholds for heavy metals, baby food manufacturers are likely to continue to face consumer lawsuits. The good news for all parties is that the Congressional report on heavy metals in baby food may have prompted the FDA to finally establish much-needed action levels.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact us: David Einhorn, Pat McNamara, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
