IOC Relaxes Rule 40 Restrictions on Non-Official Olympic Sponsors
Many of the athletes competing in Rio would not be at the Olympics without the financial support provided by corporate sponsors. However, the International Olympic Committee’s (IOC) strict advertising rules (specifically Rule 40) generally prohibit competitors from even tweeting about non-official sponsors, and those companies are banned from running advertisements featuring sponsored athletes during the Games.
In response to criticism regarding the stringent advertising restrictions, particularly with regard to the impact of athletes’ rights, the IOC did relax the rules slightly in advance of the Rio Games. However, there are still a number of hoops that businesses must jump through in order to avoid intellectual property infringement liability.
Rule 40 of the Olympic Charter
Rule 40 of the Olympic Charter states: “Except as permitted by the IOC Executive Board, no competitor, coach, trainer or official who participates in the Olympic Games may allow his person, name, picture or sports performances to be used for advertising purposes during the Olympic Games.”
The IOC’s Rule 40 guidelines place a number of restrictions on both athletes and non-Olympic commercial partners.
By way of example, any use of the image of a participant, taken during the Olympic Games, in combination with a company or brand, is prohibited. Olympic advertising rules also prohibit athletes from wearing branded apparel or accessories that are not part of the U.S. Team apparel issued by the USOC.
Under IOC guidelines, athletes may only use social media during the period of the Games for the purposes of sharing their experiences and communicating with their friends, family and supporters. Using social media for commercial and/or advertising purposes, including thanking sponsors, is expressly prohibited.
Changes Under the Relaxed Rules
In 2015, the IOC amended its Rule 40 guidance to enable continuation of in-market generic advertising featuring Rio Games participants during the Games period. The U.S. Olympic Committee (USOC) subsequently adopted the IOC’s rule change.
In order to benefit from the Rule 40 changes, U.S. athletes and non-official sponsor companies were required to submit waivers to the USOC by January 27, 2016, including plans for advertising and social media campaigns. In addition, the campaigns must have been launched by March 27, 2016.
It is important to highlight that official Olympic IP, such the Olympic rings, is still off-limits.
Approved campaigns may not include direct or indirect association with the Rio Games, the USOC, Team USA, Olympic IP or terms generally associated with the Olympic Games. However, for companies that sponsor well-known athletes like Michael Phelps or Simone Biles, the official logos aren’t really necessary for a successful campaign. For an example, check out Under Armor’s “Rule Yourself” campaign with Michael Phelps and GoPro’s digital video series, “Finding Missy,” featuring Missy Franklin.
For small businesses that did not have the opportunity to take advantage of the waiver process for the Rio Games, the 2018 Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang, South Korea are not that far away. In addition, there are ways to talk about the Olympics on social media without mentioning the Games by name, marketers just have to get creative (check out Ford’s “We Are All Fans”). Finally, Zerorez, a carpet cleaning company in Minnesota, filed a lawsuit against the USOC, alleging that the advertising rules exceed the trademark protection afforded under U.S. Code Chapter 2205.
If you are a business owner unsure of how to safely become a sponsor without liability or would like to discuss the matter further, contact me, Anthony Caruso.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
How the IOC's Amended Rule 40 is Benefiting Olympic Athletes
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
IOC Relaxes Rule 40 Restrictions on Non-Official Olympic Sponsors
Many of the athletes competing in Rio would not be at the Olympics without the financial support provided by corporate sponsors. However, the International Olympic Committee’s (IOC) strict advertising rules (specifically Rule 40) generally prohibit competitors from even tweeting about non-official sponsors, and those companies are banned from running advertisements featuring sponsored athletes during the Games.
In response to criticism regarding the stringent advertising restrictions, particularly with regard to the impact of athletes’ rights, the IOC did relax the rules slightly in advance of the Rio Games. However, there are still a number of hoops that businesses must jump through in order to avoid intellectual property infringement liability.
Rule 40 of the Olympic Charter
Rule 40 of the Olympic Charter states: “Except as permitted by the IOC Executive Board, no competitor, coach, trainer or official who participates in the Olympic Games may allow his person, name, picture or sports performances to be used for advertising purposes during the Olympic Games.”
The IOC’s Rule 40 guidelines place a number of restrictions on both athletes and non-Olympic commercial partners.
By way of example, any use of the image of a participant, taken during the Olympic Games, in combination with a company or brand, is prohibited. Olympic advertising rules also prohibit athletes from wearing branded apparel or accessories that are not part of the U.S. Team apparel issued by the USOC.
Under IOC guidelines, athletes may only use social media during the period of the Games for the purposes of sharing their experiences and communicating with their friends, family and supporters. Using social media for commercial and/or advertising purposes, including thanking sponsors, is expressly prohibited.
Changes Under the Relaxed Rules
In 2015, the IOC amended its Rule 40 guidance to enable continuation of in-market generic advertising featuring Rio Games participants during the Games period. The U.S. Olympic Committee (USOC) subsequently adopted the IOC’s rule change.
In order to benefit from the Rule 40 changes, U.S. athletes and non-official sponsor companies were required to submit waivers to the USOC by January 27, 2016, including plans for advertising and social media campaigns. In addition, the campaigns must have been launched by March 27, 2016.
It is important to highlight that official Olympic IP, such the Olympic rings, is still off-limits.
Approved campaigns may not include direct or indirect association with the Rio Games, the USOC, Team USA, Olympic IP or terms generally associated with the Olympic Games. However, for companies that sponsor well-known athletes like Michael Phelps or Simone Biles, the official logos aren’t really necessary for a successful campaign. For an example, check out Under Armor’s “Rule Yourself” campaign with Michael Phelps and GoPro’s digital video series, “Finding Missy,” featuring Missy Franklin.
For small businesses that did not have the opportunity to take advantage of the waiver process for the Rio Games, the 2018 Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang, South Korea are not that far away. In addition, there are ways to talk about the Olympics on social media without mentioning the Games by name, marketers just have to get creative (check out Ford’s “We Are All Fans”). Finally, Zerorez, a carpet cleaning company in Minnesota, filed a lawsuit against the USOC, alleging that the advertising rules exceed the trademark protection afforded under U.S. Code Chapter 2205.
If you are a business owner unsure of how to safely become a sponsor without liability or would like to discuss the matter further, contact me, Anthony Caruso.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
