Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm News
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 21, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
There generally are two types of inventors: the individual inventor/small company and the large, corporate research and development (R&D) groups.
The good news for the individual inventor is that they can “level the playing field” with the use of a professional patent search.
There are dozens of companies that are dedicated to performing exhaustive patent searches for individual investors and small businesses. Because a searcher has access to the same proprietary databases as the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), he or she can notify inventors of any previous iterations of the invention-otherwise known as prior art. Something is considered prior art if it consists of other patents, applications, or publications that have been published and are “out there” already.
Evaluating a patent searcher’s report offers a glimpse into the mind of the USPTO and what a Patent Examiner is going to consider when reviewing an application. This level of insight can be invaluable given that most patent applications are denied the first time they are filed and you can know what the overall “patent landscape” looks like when drafting and prosecuting a patent application.
“Prosecuting a patent” is the term given to the sometimes long and arduous back-and-forth process between the inventor and the USPTO regarding what should be protected, how the invention is different from prior art, and the breadth of protection that should be granted. As the name implies, prosecuting a patent is a semi-adversarial process.
Boiled down to basics, prosecuting a patent often involves examining the components of an invention and asserting the uniqueness of one or more of those components. For instance, if an existing product is composed of components A + B + C, an inventor may successfully prosecute a patent using the components A2 + B + C. In other words, it is prudent to methodically develop the new, innovative variations applied to an established patent (A2 in this example).
Investing in a patent search helps inventors identify any potential problems they may encounter during the prosecution of a patent. Once the weakness is known, we can begin to focus on the solution, whether it be changing a component of the invention or using different language in the drafting process. It’s always good to know what is out there and what the possibilities are, and a search can provide that understanding.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Brian D. Spector is producing What Exit?, a new entertainment podcast featuring industry news and guests from the Garden State. Hosted by Jared Goldsmith (Dear Evan Hansen), the podcast premiered on Saturday, August 29, 2026, and is available on Spotify and YouTube. What Exit? takes its […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Sean M. Pena, a Partner in the firm’s Litigation group, has been appointed as an Adjunct Professor in the Department of Political Science and Law at Montclair State University. He will teach Perspectives on Law: Theoretical Foundations and Practical Applications of United States Legal Systems during the […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Nine Scarinci Hollenbeck Attorneys Recognized in 2027 Edition of Best Lawyers in America® Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that nine of its attorneys have been recognized in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America®. First published in 1983, Best Lawyers is universally regarded […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Scarinci Hollenbeck Congratulates Environmental Law Scholarship Recipient Talha Iqbal! Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC has awarded the second annual Theodore A. Schwartz Scholarship for Environmental Law to Talha Iqbal, a rising third-year student at Rutgers Law School in Newark. Mr. Iqbal will receive $2,500 to support his continued legal education. The Environmental Law Scholarship is awarded annually […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Two Partners, a Counsel, and a Senior Associate Deepen the Firm’s Litigation Bench in Little Falls, Red Bank, and New York City Following last month’s announcement that eight attorneys joined the firm, Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC continues its expansion, this time strengthening its Litigation Group. The firm welcomes Paul S. Grossman and Jay R. McDaniel as […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Unanimous Controversies Committee ruling addresses the scope of an athletic association’s disciplinary authority and the procedural standards governing its exercise. Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC announced today that Partner Robert E. Levy served as counsel to the New Jersey State Interscholastic Athletic Association (NJSIAA) in the proceedings that resulted in the revocation of the 2025 regional and […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!