Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Client Alert

US Copyright Office Relaxing Registration Timing Requirements During the COVID Crisis 

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: April 8, 2020

Key Contacts

Back

The U.S. Copyright Office has extended certain deadlines to accommodate copyright owners

The U.S. Copyright Office has extended certain deadlines to accommodate copyright owners that are prevented from completing or submitting applications for copyright registration or other documents for filing with the Copyright Office due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19). Much like the trademark and patent relief provided by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the extensions were authorized under Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act).

US Copyright Office Relaxing Registration Timing Requirements During the COVID Crisis

As set forth in a Public Notice issued on April 6, 2020, the Copyright Office is allowing impacted copyright owners to receive additional time to register a work. This is significant, given that under Section 412 the Copyright Act, a copyright owner’s right to be awarded statutory damages in a copyright infringement action may be negatively impacted if the work allegedly being infringed is not registered prior to the infringement or within three months of the work’s first publication. The Copyright Office is providing similar accommodations for those who are prevented from serving or recording notices of termination within statutorily required time periods.  

Copyright Registration 

First, it is important to note that not all registration deadlines have been extended. For all copyright applications that can be submitted entirely in electronic form (i.e., those that do not require submission of a physical deposit), the timing provisions have not changed. Below are the accommodations that the Copyright Office is providing:

  • If an applicant can submit an application electronically but is unable to submit a required physical deposit, the applicant should upload, together with the application, a declaration or similar statement certifying, under penalty of perjury, that the applicant is unable to submit the physical deposit and would have done so but for the national emergency, and setting forth satisfactory evidence in support. If this requirement is met, and the three-month window for registration after the date of first publication was open as of March 13, 2020, the window will be extended such that the applicant will be eligible for the remedies under section 412, provided that the applicant submits the required deposit within thirty days after the date the disruption has ended, as stated in a public announcement by the Acting Register. Examples of satisfactory evidence include, but are not limited to, a statement that the applicant is subject to a stay-at-home order issued by a state or local government; or a statement that the applicant is unable to access required physical materials due to closure of the business where they are located.
  • If an applicant is unable to submit an application electronically or physically during the disruption, the applicant may submit an application after the Acting Register has announced the end of the disruption, and include a declaration or similar statement certifying, under penalty of perjury, that the applicant was unable to submit an application electronically or physically and would have done so but for the national emergency, and providing satisfactory evidence in support. If this requirement is met, the three-month window under section 412 will be tolled between March 13, 2020, and the date that the disruption has ended. For example, if a work was first published on February 13, 2020, the applicant would have two months following the end of the disruption to register the work in order to be eligible for the remedies under section 412. Satisfactory evidence for purposes of this option includes, but is not limited to, a statement that the applicant did not have access to a computer and/or the internet; or a statement that the applicant was prevented from accessing or sending required physical materials for reasons such as those noted above.

Notice of Termination

The Copyright Office is also relaxing the timing requirements for serving and recording notices of termination. Under section 203 and section 304(c) of the Copyright Act, individual authors may reclaim copyright interests previously transferred to another party in specified circumstances. In general, an author may terminate a transfer within a five-year window, provided that the author serves notice on the transferee between two and ten years before the chosen termination date. After service, the notice must be recorded with the Copyright Office.

To ensure that these authors are not deprived of their ability to effectively terminate a transfer, the Copyright Office will temporarily adjust the section 203 and 304(c) timing requirements to the extent they apply to persons affected by the national emergency. These adjustments will apply as follows:

  • Where the termination window is expiring: the five-year window for terminating a transfer will be extended during the period of disruption if: (1) the author’s five-year termination window expires on or after March 13, 2022, and less than two years after the date the disruption ends; (2) the author serves a notice of termination within thirty days after the date the Acting Register announces as the date the disruption has ended; and (3) the notice of termination is accompanied by a declaration or similar statement certifying, under penalty of perjury, that but for the national emergency, the author would have been able to serve the notice at least two years before the close of the five-year window, and setting forth an explanatory statement in support of that certification. This statement must also be included in the material sent to the Copyright Office when the notice is later recorded. The Office will then annotate the public record to reflect this certification. When an author meets these requirements, the notice will be considered timely served under section 203(a)(4)(A) or 304(c)(4)(A). The author still would have to choose a termination date at least two years after the date of service.
  • Where the window to record is expiring: The requirement that a notice be recorded before the date of termination will be waived if (1) the author has already served the notice on the transferee; (2) the termination date listed on the notice is on or after March 14, 2020, and on or before the date the Acting Register announces as the date the disruption has ended; (3) the author records the notice within thirty days after the date the disruption has ended; and (4) the recordation submission includes a declaration or similar statement certifying, under penalty of perjury, that the author would have submitted the notice in a timely manner but for the national emergency, and setting forth satisfactory evidence in support of that statement. As is true for registration applications, satisfactory evidence would include, but not be limited to, a statement that the author was prevented from accessing or mailing the required physical materials. When an author satisfies the above requirements, the notice will be treated as timely recorded for purposes of section 203(a)(4)(A) or 304(c)(4)(A). The Copyright Office will annotate the public record to reflect that determination.

Additional Extensions

According to the Copyright Office, it will consider additional “appropriate” modifications as it becomes aware of sufficient disruption to the copyright system caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Members of the public who have been affected in their ability to participate in the copyright system should consult with intellectual property attorneys regarding their options.

If you have questions, please contact us

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Senate Continuing Resolution Would Delay Upcoming Federal Hemp Restrictions post image

Senate Continuing Resolution Would Delay Upcoming Federal Hemp Restrictions

Industry Faces Continued Uncertainty Ahead of the November 2026 Deadline The U.S. Senate has introduced a funding measure that would temporarily delay implementation of sweeping federal hemp restrictions scheduled to take effect on November 12, 2026. While the proposal provides a potential short-term reprieve for hemp-derived cannabinoid manufacturers, retailers, distributors, and investors, it does not […]

Author: Daniel T. McKillop

Link to post with title - "Senate Continuing Resolution Would Delay Upcoming Federal Hemp Restrictions"
New Jersey Data Center Bans Draw a Second Developer Lawsuit, and a $300 Million Damages Claim post image

New Jersey Data Center Bans Draw a Second Developer Lawsuit, and a $300 Million Damages Claim

New Jersey municipalities are moving aggressively to keep data centers out, and developers are beginning to push back in court. Within the span of a month, two New Jersey townships have been sued by data center developers over local bans, and one of those suits seeks damages in excess of $300 million. Property owners, developers, […]

Author: Daniel T. McKillop

Link to post with title - "New Jersey Data Center Bans Draw a Second Developer Lawsuit, and a $300 Million Damages Claim"
New Jersey Enacts Sweeping Data Broker Law That Could Affect More Businesses Than Expected post image

New Jersey Enacts Sweeping Data Broker Law That Could Affect More Businesses Than Expected

On June 30, 2026, Governor Mikie Sherrill signed Assembly Bill 5328 (P.L.2026, c.25), establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework governing data brokers and certain businesses that sell or license personal information. While the New Jersey data broker law has garnered attention for imposing annual registration fees that can reach $1.5 million, its significance extends well beyond […]

Author: George McGowan

Link to post with title - "New Jersey Enacts Sweeping Data Broker Law That Could Affect More Businesses Than Expected"
New Jersey Enacts 'Power NJ Act' as Gov. Sherrill Signs Advanced Nuclear Procurement Into Law post image

New Jersey Enacts 'Power NJ Act' as Gov. Sherrill Signs Advanced Nuclear Procurement Into Law

Following near-unanimous passage by both the Assembly and Senate, Governor Sherrill has signed the Power NJ Act (S4296/A4881) into law, formally establishing New Jersey’s first statutory pathway for procuring advanced nuclear energy facilities. As we reported when the Legislature passed the bill, the Power NJ Act directs the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU), […]

Author: Daniel T. McKillop

Link to post with title - "New Jersey Enacts 'Power NJ Act' as Gov. Sherrill Signs Advanced Nuclear Procurement Into Law"
New Jersey Legislature Passes “Power NJ Act” Clearing Path for Advanced Nuclear Energy Development post image

New Jersey Legislature Passes “Power NJ Act” Clearing Path for Advanced Nuclear Energy Development

On June 30, 2026, the New Jersey Assembly and Senate both approved the “Power NJ Act” (A4881), sending the legislation to Governor Sherrill for signature after unanimous, bipartisan approval. The Power NJ Act would direct the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, in partnership with the New Jersey Economic Development Authority, to establish a program […]

Author: Daniel T. McKillop

Link to post with title - "New Jersey Legislature Passes “Power NJ Act” Clearing Path for Advanced Nuclear Energy Development"
NJ Supreme Court Confirms Personal Email Is Within OPRA's Reach: What Boards, Municipalities, Public Officials and Public Entities Must Do Now post image

NJ Supreme Court Confirms Personal Email Is Within OPRA's Reach: What Boards, Municipalities, Public Officials and Public Entities Must Do Now

If Your Public Officials Conduct Public Business on Personal Accounts, Those Communications May Be Subject to Disclosure under the New Jersey Open Public Records Act (N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 et seq.). A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision has direct consequences for every board of education, municipality, and public agency in the state. In Rosetti v. Ramapo-Indian […]

Author: Seraphema Menna

Link to post with title - "NJ Supreme Court Confirms Personal Email Is Within OPRA's Reach: What Boards, Municipalities, Public Officials and Public Entities Must Do Now"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!