
John M. Scagnelli
Partner
201-896-4100 jscagnelli@sh-law.comClient Alert
Author: John M. Scagnelli
Date: August 31, 2022

Partner
201-896-4100 jscagnelli@sh-law.com
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) recently announced seven new environmental enforcement actions. The suits, which are part of the Murphy Administration’s ongoing environmental justice initiative, have the potential to result in significant liability for the entities involved.
Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Environmental Law Group, which is one of New Jersey’s most experienced and respected, is well-positioned to help defend environmental justice lawsuits and help impacted entities reach a successful resolution. Our environmental attorneys are skilled in both environmental litigation and remediation strategies and have a proven track record of working together to help our clients minimize or avoid costly liability for contamination.
Over the past several years, the Murphy Administration has taken numerous steps to elevate the importance of environmental justice. As we have discussed in prior articles, its actions to address pollution and environmental hazards in minority and lower-income communities include launching an environmental justice initiative, creating an Environmental Justice Advisory Council, spearheading the enactment of New Jersey’s Environmental Justice Law, and bringing enforcement actions targeting polluters in minority and lower-income communities.
According to the NJDEP, its most recent enforcement actions are intended to “send a message to polluters,” particularly those with property located in overburdened communities. “In New Jersey, we are confronting the historic injustices that have burdened low-income and minority communities with a disproportionate amount of pollution,” DEP Commissioner Shawn LaTourette said in a press statement. “Our commitment to furthering the promise of environmental justice sometimes demands that we take legal action to correct the legacy of pollution that underserved communities have endured.”
The suits allege violations of New Jersey’s Spill Compensation and Control Act, Brownfield and Contaminated Site Remediation Act, Industrial Site Recovery Act, Water Pollution Control Act, Solid Waste Management Act, and Industrial Site Remediation Reform Act and involve several different types of alleged contamination, such as former filling station operations that discharged gasoline, diesel fuel, and waste oil into the ground and dumping tainted fill at a former coal ash disposal site. The remedies sought in the suits include clean-up of the contaminated properties, payment of civil penalties, compliance with administrative orders previously issued by the NJDEP, and reimbursement to the State for the cost of site investigation, remediation, monitoring, and other related work.
The recent enforcement actions confirm that addressing contamination in minority and lower-income communities remains a top priority for the Murphy Administration. According to the NJDEP, including the lawsuits filed today, the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office and NJDEP have filed a total of 52 environmental justice cases since 2018. To date, the lawsuits have yielded nearly $20 million in judgments.
For entities currently facing enforcement actions, it is imperative to take swift legal action. If you have not done so already, the first step is to contact an experienced environmental law attorney.
All other property owners and others that may be responsible for pollution and other environmental hazards in such communities should also be prepared for increased scrutiny. Given that the costs of remediation and related enforcement penalties, businesses should also be proactive in seeking legal counsel.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Senate Bill 21 This bill was enacted largely in response to high-profile litigation, such as In re Match Group (In re Match Grp., Inc. Deriv. Litig., 315 A.3d 446 (Del. 2024)) and TripAdvisor (Maffei v. Palkon, 2025 WL 384054 (Del. Feb. 4, 2025)) and to stem the recent tide of Delaware companies reincorporating in Neveda […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

The New York Corporate Transparency Act (NYCTA) WILL NOT apply to US-registered LLCs. In recent years, there has been significant interest in identifying the “beneficial owners” of U.S. businesses to combat perceived financial crimes such as money laundering, terrorism financing, and tax fraud by ending the use of anonymous shell companies. This led to the […]
Author: Scott H. Novak

On December 18, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order titled Increasing Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research, marking the most consequential federal cannabis policy action in decades. While the Order does not legalize marijuana or immediately alter its status under federal law, it directs the administration to complete the long-anticipated rescheduling of cannabis under […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

In ML, Inc. v. Edison Township Board of Education, the New Jersey Appellate Division reinforced the discretion of public entities to draft and enforce timing requirements as to the dates of key bid forms that are required to be submitted with public bids. The court upheld the Edison Township Board of Education’s decision to award a […]
Author: David L. Blank

On November 17, 2025, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) changed its previously proposed rule which would have required persons conducting All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI)(due diligence) at real properties to report any discharge of contamination discovered during the due diligence to NJDEP and the record owner of the property. NJDEP has now changed […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

Recent reports indicate that President Trump is preparing to issue an executive order as early as Monday, December 15 directing his administration to finalize the long-anticipated reclassification of cannabis under the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) from Schedule I to Schedule III. This development follows years of regulatory review and political debate spanning multiple administrations […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!