
Nathanya G. Simon
Partner
201-896-7223 nsimon@sh-law.comClient Alert
Author: Nathanya G. Simon
Date: June 28, 2021

Partner
201-896-7223 nsimon@sh-law.com
On June 16, 2021, Gov. Phil Murphy signed legislation requiring boards of education to consider offering additional or compensatory special education and related services, including transition services, for a maximum of one additional year to students with disabilities following a determination made by the student’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) team that the student requires such additional or compensatory special education and related services. The new law aims to address the loss of learning that special education students may have suffered in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Generally, boards of education are required to provide a free, appropriate public education, in accordance with an individualized education program (IEP), to students with disabilities age three through 21. If a student turns 21 years of age during the school year, defined as the period between July 1 and June 30, the student is entitled to finish the school year. On June 30 of the student’s final school year, the student is no longer eligible for special education and related services. Accordingly, absent this law, no additional services were available as a matter of law.
The new law, P.L.2021, c.109 (S-3434), mandates that boards of education review and consider providing special education and related services for students exceeding age of eligibility in some circumstances. Below are several key provisions of the new law:
On June 16, 2021, the New Jersey Department of Education (DOE) issued a memorandum intended to provide guidance to school districts, students, and parents/guardians of students with disabilities regarding the new law. The guidance outlines the key provisions of P.L.2021, c.109 (S-3434) and its impact on special education and related services for students with disabilities.
The DOE memo also emphasizes that the new law does not guarantee that all students exceeding their eligibility will receive additional or compensatory services. “Consistent with Reopening Guidance issued by the United States Department of Education (USED), the March 3, 2021 NJDOE Compensatory Education Guidance, and relevant case law, the newly enacted law emphasizes the role of the student’s IEP team in determining the individual student’s need for compensatory education or services, as well as the type, frequency or location of those services,” the memo states.
The DOE memo also notes that students or their parents/guardians may seek dispute resolution if there is disagreement with the IEP team’s determination that the student does not require additional or compensatory education, or if there is disagreement about the IEP team’s proposed type, frequency or location of additional or compensatory education. “Dispute resolution options include mediation conferences, due process hearings, and/or complaints alleging a violation of special education law,” the DOE states.
Additionally, a filing for emergent relief seeking an order of “stay put” and additional services may also be filed. At such time, specific areas of loss that require compensatory services will be considered by an Administrative Law Judge. Lastly, it is recommended that IEP teams carefully review the goals and objectives and transition services, CBI and other services that are in the program for those students turning 21 during the 2021-2022 and 2022-2023 school years and target those over the remaining eligible years of education entitlement.
If you have legal concerns related to the new special education and how it may impact your school district, we encourage you to contact Nathanya G. Simon, Partner & Chair of the Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Special Education law practice group or a member of Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Education Law Group at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

On January 29, 2026, the New York City Council enacted Local Law 58 of 2026, adding a new chapter to the New York City Administrative Code that imposes statutory deadlines on cooperative boards when reviewing purchase applications that require board approval. The law addresses longstanding concerns about protracted and unpredictable co-op approval timelines and will […]
Author: Scott E. Koop

On January 5, 2026, the New Jersey Appellate Division issued a published decision in In the Matter of the Adoption of N.J.A.C. 7:1C, rejecting consolidated challenges filed by industry and labor petitioners to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s Environmental Justice Rules. The decision affirms NJDEP’s authority to implement New Jersey’s 2020 Environmental Justice […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

On November 18, 2025, President Trump nominated M. Carter Crow, the Global Head of Labor and Employment at Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, to be General Counsel of the EEOC. Carter Crow focuses his practice on wage and hour litigation, contracts, and restrictive covenants. As of this writing, Carter Crow has yet to be voted out […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

What the Commission’s New Majority Means for Workplace Enforcement and Employer Compliance On October 7, 2025, the U.S. Senate confirmed President Trump’s nomination of Brittany Bull Panuccio to a vacant seat on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or the Commission). Commissioner Panuccio’s confirmation grants EEOC a quorum for the first time since President Trump’s […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

As discussed in prior updates, Governor Hochul’s administration has proposed targeted adjustments to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) to reduce procedural delay for certain housing projects that do not present significant environmental impacts. These proposals are part of the Governor’s 2026 agenda and include targeted SEQRA exemptions, geographic eligibility limits, floodplain exclusions, and […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

New York State is pursuing a significant reform initiative aimed at reducing procedural delays associated with the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) for certain housing projects. The proposal, which is part of Governor Kathy Hochul’s 2026 State of the State agenda under the “Let Them Build” initiative, seeks to create targeted exemptions from SEQRA […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!