
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: July 23, 2013

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comTrusts and estates are now subject to the new 3.8% tax on Net Investment Income (NII) in excess of an income threshold of $11,950 in 2013. NII includes interest, dividends, rents, royalties or income from a trade or business that is a passive activity under IRC §469 (Passive Loss Rules). A trust can avoid the 3.8% tax by distributing NII, in other words, becoming a “Special Trustee”. The threshold is called Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) and is equal to $11,950 for trusts, $250,000 for a married couple and $125,000 for a single filer. (MAGI may be subject to other adjustments that are not covered here.) The 3.8% tax may be avoided if MAGI of the recipient beneficiaries is below the MAGI threshold applicable to their filing status.
Where a profitable business is held in trust and the beneficiary has other substantial income, distribution of income from the Trust may not avoid the 3.8% tax. One should also note that trust may not have been intended to provide the beneficiaries with substantial distributions. The grantor of the trust may have intended that income be accumulated rather than distributed. The income could be accumulated for future needs or a nest egg. It may be accumulated in order to encourage the beneficiary to become self-reliant and a productive member of society. In either case, avoiding the 3.8% tax is important.
Interest, dividends, royalties and rents may be excluded from the definition of NII if they are derived in the ordinary course of a trade or business. Having a trade or business makes the income active and avoids the 3.8% tax on passive income. How does a trust owning stock in an S corporation that operates a business qualify for this exception? How does a limited liability company that owns a shopping center qualify where it provides substantial services?
The IRS takes (and litigates) the position that only the direct actions of the trustee may be considered in determining whether a trust materially participates in the business thereby converting income from passive subject to 3.8% tax to active income and avoiding this tax. Some states permit a trustee to delegate authority to agents (e.g. Estate of Carter in Texas) while other states permit the use of special trustees whose sole function is to operate the business.
Now is the time to review trusts and the income earned. States that permit the use of special trustees and self-directed trusts are closer to solving the problem.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!