Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: June 22, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comBy and large, these appeals are conducted on a contingent fee basis. That is to say the attorney will not earn a fee except as a percentage of savings actually achieved upon resolution of the case. As cases drag on for three (3) and four (4) years at a time requiring repetitive filings against the same property in order to maintain the tax appeals, clients rightfully become antsy and wonder when the process is going to come to an end.
The answer is, any lawyer taking on a real property tax case should advise his client of the snail pace of such litigation.
The problem is sheer volume. With over 35,000 cases pending, and only six (6) Tax Court Judges, new matters are being assigned tentative trial dates two (2) years out and later. Add to that the fact that Tax Court Judges are retiring and new ones are not coming on quickly enough and an unavoidable log jam is created. The filing for tax property appeals is at a record high. As reported by the Tax Court in its 2012 annual report, in 2012, over 15,000 new cases were filed. The court further reports that only approximately 6,000 cases were resolved during the calendar year 2012. While a number of the filings in 2012 may have been repetitive filings against the same property, it is clear that the new incoming filed cases far exceed the case numbers being resolved. Add to that the lack of motivation for a town to resolve quickly any tax appeal where a large refund is likely to occur and you have the makings of a considerable foot dragging situation aided and abetted by an overwhelmed and overburdened tax court system.
Accordingly, when considering the filing of a tax appeal case, don’t expect immediate results. Instead, prepare for the long haul.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!