Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: June 22, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comBy and large, these appeals are conducted on a contingent fee basis. That is to say the attorney will not earn a fee except as a percentage of savings actually achieved upon resolution of the case. As cases drag on for three (3) and four (4) years at a time requiring repetitive filings against the same property in order to maintain the tax appeals, clients rightfully become antsy and wonder when the process is going to come to an end.
The answer is, any lawyer taking on a real property tax case should advise his client of the snail pace of such litigation.
The problem is sheer volume. With over 35,000 cases pending, and only six (6) Tax Court Judges, new matters are being assigned tentative trial dates two (2) years out and later. Add to that the fact that Tax Court Judges are retiring and new ones are not coming on quickly enough and an unavoidable log jam is created. The filing for tax property appeals is at a record high. As reported by the Tax Court in its 2012 annual report, in 2012, over 15,000 new cases were filed. The court further reports that only approximately 6,000 cases were resolved during the calendar year 2012. While a number of the filings in 2012 may have been repetitive filings against the same property, it is clear that the new incoming filed cases far exceed the case numbers being resolved. Add to that the lack of motivation for a town to resolve quickly any tax appeal where a large refund is likely to occur and you have the makings of a considerable foot dragging situation aided and abetted by an overwhelmed and overburdened tax court system.
Accordingly, when considering the filing of a tax appeal case, don’t expect immediate results. Instead, prepare for the long haul.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!