Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

The History Behind the Annual White House Turkey Pardon

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: November 24, 2020

Key Contacts

Back
The History Behind the Annual White House Turkey Pardon

While the COVID-19 pandemic may have changed a lot in 2020, one holiday tradition will continue…

While the COVID-19 pandemic may have changed a lot in 2020, one holiday tradition will continue. On November 24, President Donald Trump will “pardon” a White House turkey.

This year’s turkeys were raised by the chairman of the National Turkey Foundation, Ron Kardel, an Iowa turkey farmer. Once they arrive in Washington, D.C., the turkeys will stay at the Willard Hotel and then proceed to the White House on Tuesday for the official ceremony. During the annual tradition, one turkey will become the National Thanksgiving Turkey, and the other will serve as the alternate. After the “pardon,” both turkeys will spend the rest of their lives at Iowa State University.

So how did this become an annual Thanksgiving tradition?

The roots of the annual White House turkey pardon date back centuries. However, it didn’t become an “official” ceremony until 1989 under President George H.W. Bush.

In 1863, President Abraham Lincoln reportedly granted clemency to a turkey, an event that was recorded in an 1865 dispatch by White House reporter Noah Brooks. He wrote: “A live turkey had been brought home for the Christmas dinner, but [Lincoln’s son Tad] interceded in behalf of its life. . . . [Tad’s] plea was admitted and the turkey’s life spared.”

Over the years, turkey farmers often gifted turkeys to U.S. presidents. According to the White House Historical Association, “poultry gifts were frequently touched with patriotism, partisanship, and glee.” In 1921, an American Legion post decorated the crate of a turkey sent from Mississippi to Washington with patriotic bunting, while a Harding Girls Club in Chicago dressed up its bird as a flying ace, even adorning it with goggles. First Lady Grace Coolidge accepted a turkey from a Vermont Girl Scout in 1925.

While the White House accepted turkeys, the act of “pardoning” them was not a tradition until much later. In 1963, the Washington Post used the terms “pardon” and “reprieve” in an article in which President John F. Kennedy said of the turkey, “Let’s keep him going.” First Lady Patricia Nixon accepted turkeys on behalf of President Richard Nixon and then sent them to the Oxon Hill Children’s Farm. First Lady Rosalynn Carter sent the turkey presented to President Jimmy Carter to a mini zoo at Evans Farm Inn. However, there was no official “pardoning” of the birds.

While President Ronald Reagan solidified the practice of sending the turkeys to a farm, the White House Historical Association maintains that the formal act of pardoning a turkey gelled by 1989, when President George H. W. Bush, with animal rights activists picketing nearby, quipped, “But let me assure you, and this fine tom turkey, that he will not end up on anyone’s dinner table, not this guy — he’s granted a Presidential pardon as of right now — and allow him to live out his days on a children’s farm not far from here.”

Although 2020 has been a challenging year, it has also made us all a little more grateful. Happy Thanksgiving from all of us at Scarinci Hollenbeck!

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable? post image

Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?"
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery post image

How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery"
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore post image

The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore"
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers post image

BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers"
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected? post image

IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?"
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next post image

Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!