Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 30, 2024
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
Disputes among members of a limited liability company (LLC) are not uncommon and can often be resolved outside of court. However, LLC disputes can sometimes escalate to the point that an LLC seeks to expel a member from the business. When seeking to remove a member, LLCs may rely on the provisions of their operating agreement regarding expulsion. In the absence of such an agreement, the New Jersey’s Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act will govern.
There are various reasons why a New Jersey LLC may want to remove a member, including retirement, internal disputes, wrongful conduct, or death. In some cases, the members of an LLC can hold a meeting and adopt a resolution to remove the member (if approved by the majority of votes). However, if the member contests the removal, court intervention may be necessary.
Many operating agreements contain provisions establishing when a member may be removed from the LLC. This is the simplest way to expel a member as the grounds for expulsion and required procedures are outlined in terms of the agreement. A well-drafted operating agreement will address both voluntary resignations and involuntary removals. Expulsion provisions should specify when a member can be expelled, the required votes for expelling an LLC member, and the procedure for buying out the departing member’s interest.
In the absence of an operating agreement or provision in an operating agreement regarding expulsion, New Jersey’sRevised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (LLC Act) controls. The statute provides for the disassociation of another member under several circumstances including where a member gave notice of withdrawal; where the person is expelled as a member under the operating agreement; or where the member is a corporate entity or partnership that has dissolved or had its charter revoked.
When the parties can’t reach an agreement out of court, an LLC may expel a member by judicial order. Specifically, a New Jersey court may order a member expelled under the following circumstances: (a) the member engaged in wrongful conduct that adversely and materially affected the LLC’s business; (b) the member willfully or persistently committed a material breach of the operating agreement; or (c) the member engaged in conduct relating to the LLC’s business which makes it not reasonably practicable to carry on the business with the member as a member of the LLC.
In IE Test, LLC v. Carroll, the New Jersey Supreme Court addressed the “not reasonably practicable” standard, confirming that LCCs must meet a high bar to be granted judicial expulsion. According to the justices, the New Jersey Legislature did not intend for expulsion to be available whenever “it would be more challenging or complicated for other members to run the business with the LLC member than without him.” Instead, the LLC Act mandates that it must be “unfeasible, despite reasonable efforts, to keep the LLC operating while the disputed member remains affiliated with it.”
As the New Jersey Supreme Court noted, the LLC Act does not define the term “not reasonably practicable,” or specifically describe the conduct that implicates subsection 3(c) of the LLC Act. Accordingly, the Court established a multi-factor test, under which no factor is determinative:
Expelling an LLC member is often fraught with business and legal challenges. Scarinci Hollenbeck’s business litigation attorneys have significant experience resolving LLC disputes, including LLC expulsions. Our experienced attorneys also routinely work with LLCs to draft operating agreements that protect the interests of the LCC members and help prevent protracted legal battles.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!