Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

When Can a New Jersey LLC Expel One of Its Members?

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: April 30, 2024

Key Contacts

Back
When Can a New Jersey LLC Expel One of Its Members?

Disputes among members of a limited liability company (LLC) are not uncommon and can often be resolved outside of court. However, LLC disputes can sometimes escalate to the point that an LLC seeks to expel a member from the business. When seeking to remove a member, LLCs may rely on the provisions of their operating agreement regarding expulsion. In the absence of such an agreement, the New Jersey’s Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act will govern.

Grounds for LLC Expulsion

There are various reasons why a New Jersey LLC may want to remove a member, including retirement, internal disputes, wrongful conduct, or death. In some cases, the members of an LLC can hold a meeting and adopt a resolution to remove the member (if approved by the majority of votes). However, if the member contests the removal, court intervention may be necessary.

Operating Agreements

Many operating agreements contain provisions establishing when a member may be removed from the LLC. This is the simplest way to expel a member as the grounds for expulsion and required procedures are outlined in terms of the agreement. A well-drafted operating agreement will address both voluntary resignations and involuntary removals. Expulsion provisions should specify when a member can be expelled, the required votes for expelling an LLC member, and the procedure for buying out the departing member’s interest.

New Jersey LLC Act

In the absence of an operating agreement or provision in an operating agreement regarding expulsion, New Jersey’sRevised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (LLC Act) controls. The statute provides for the disassociation of another member under several circumstances including where a member gave notice of withdrawal; where the person is expelled as a member under the operating agreement; or where the member is a corporate entity or partnership that has dissolved or had its charter revoked.

Judicial LLC Expulsion

When the parties can’t reach an agreement out of court, an LLC may expel a member by judicial order. Specifically, a New Jersey court may order a member expelled under the following circumstances: (a) the member engaged in wrongful conduct that adversely and materially affected the LLC’s business; (b) the member willfully or persistently committed a material breach of the operating agreement; or (c) the member engaged in conduct relating to the LLC’s business which makes it not reasonably practicable to carry on the business with the member as a member of the LLC.

In IE Test, LLC v. Carroll, the New Jersey Supreme Court addressed the “not reasonably practicable” standard, confirming that LCCs must meet a high bar to be granted judicial expulsion. According to the justices, the New Jersey Legislature did not intend for expulsion to be available whenever “it would be more challenging or complicated for other members to run the business with the LLC member than without him.” Instead, the LLC Act mandates that it must be “unfeasible, despite reasonable efforts, to keep the LLC operating while the disputed member remains affiliated with it.”

As the New Jersey Supreme Court noted, the LLC Act does not define the term “not reasonably practicable,” or specifically describe the conduct that implicates subsection 3(c) of the LLC Act. Accordingly, the Court established a multi-factor test, under which no factor is determinative:

  • The nature of the member’s conduct in relation to the company’s business;
  • Whether the entity can be managed to promote the purposes for which it was formed with the member remaining;
  • Whether the dispute precludes the members from working with one another to pursue the company’s goals;
  • Whether there is a deadlock among the members;
  • Whether, despite deadlock, members can make decisions on the management of the company under the operating agreement;
  • Whether there is still a business to operate, in light of the company’s financial position; and
  • Whether continuing the company with the member is financially feasible.

Key Takeaway

Expelling an LLC member is often fraught with business and legal challenges. Scarinci Hollenbeck’s business litigation attorneys have significant experience resolving LLC disputes, including LLC expulsions. Our experienced attorneys also routinely work with LLCs to draft operating agreements that protect the interests of the LCC members and help prevent protracted legal battles. 

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests post image

Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests

If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]

Author: Christopher D. Warren

Link to post with title - "Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests"
The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions post image

The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions

Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions"
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public post image

Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public

Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public"
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions post image

Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions

Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions"
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide post image

Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide

For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide"
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination post image

Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination

Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]

Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

Link to post with title - "Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!