Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 30, 2024
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
Disputes among members of a limited liability company (LLC) are not uncommon and can often be resolved outside of court. However, LLC disputes can sometimes escalate to the point that an LLC seeks to expel a member from the business. When seeking to remove a member, LLCs may rely on the provisions of their operating agreement regarding expulsion. In the absence of such an agreement, the New Jersey’s Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act will govern.
There are various reasons why a New Jersey LLC may want to remove a member, including retirement, internal disputes, wrongful conduct, or death. In some cases, the members of an LLC can hold a meeting and adopt a resolution to remove the member (if approved by the majority of votes). However, if the member contests the removal, court intervention may be necessary.
Many operating agreements contain provisions establishing when a member may be removed from the LLC. This is the simplest way to expel a member as the grounds for expulsion and required procedures are outlined in terms of the agreement. A well-drafted operating agreement will address both voluntary resignations and involuntary removals. Expulsion provisions should specify when a member can be expelled, the required votes for expelling an LLC member, and the procedure for buying out the departing member’s interest.
In the absence of an operating agreement or provision in an operating agreement regarding expulsion, New Jersey’sRevised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (LLC Act) controls. The statute provides for the disassociation of another member under several circumstances including where a member gave notice of withdrawal; where the person is expelled as a member under the operating agreement; or where the member is a corporate entity or partnership that has dissolved or had its charter revoked.
When the parties can’t reach an agreement out of court, an LLC may expel a member by judicial order. Specifically, a New Jersey court may order a member expelled under the following circumstances: (a) the member engaged in wrongful conduct that adversely and materially affected the LLC’s business; (b) the member willfully or persistently committed a material breach of the operating agreement; or (c) the member engaged in conduct relating to the LLC’s business which makes it not reasonably practicable to carry on the business with the member as a member of the LLC.
In IE Test, LLC v. Carroll, the New Jersey Supreme Court addressed the “not reasonably practicable” standard, confirming that LCCs must meet a high bar to be granted judicial expulsion. According to the justices, the New Jersey Legislature did not intend for expulsion to be available whenever “it would be more challenging or complicated for other members to run the business with the LLC member than without him.” Instead, the LLC Act mandates that it must be “unfeasible, despite reasonable efforts, to keep the LLC operating while the disputed member remains affiliated with it.”
As the New Jersey Supreme Court noted, the LLC Act does not define the term “not reasonably practicable,” or specifically describe the conduct that implicates subsection 3(c) of the LLC Act. Accordingly, the Court established a multi-factor test, under which no factor is determinative:
Expelling an LLC member is often fraught with business and legal challenges. Scarinci Hollenbeck’s business litigation attorneys have significant experience resolving LLC disputes, including LLC expulsions. Our experienced attorneys also routinely work with LLCs to draft operating agreements that protect the interests of the LCC members and help prevent protracted legal battles.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!