
Jay R. McDaniel
Partner
201-896-7042 jmcdaniel@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Jay R. McDaniel
Date: April 30, 2024

Partner
201-896-7042 jmcdaniel@sh-law.com
Disputes among members of a limited liability company (LLC) are not uncommon and can often be resolved outside of court. However, LLC disputes can sometimes escalate to the point that an LLC seeks to expel a member from the business. When seeking to remove a member, LLCs may rely on the provisions of their operating agreement regarding expulsion. In the absence of such an agreement, the New Jersey’s Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act will govern.
There are various reasons why a New Jersey LLC may want to remove a member, including retirement, internal disputes, wrongful conduct, or death. In some cases, the members of an LLC can hold a meeting and adopt a resolution to remove the member (if approved by the majority of votes). However, if the member contests the removal, court intervention may be necessary.
Many operating agreements contain provisions establishing when a member may be removed from the LLC. This is the simplest way to expel a member as the grounds for expulsion and required procedures are outlined in terms of the agreement. A well-drafted operating agreement will address both voluntary resignations and involuntary removals. Expulsion provisions should specify when a member can be expelled, the required votes for expelling an LLC member, and the procedure for buying out the departing member’s interest.
In the absence of an operating agreement or provision in an operating agreement regarding expulsion, New Jersey’s Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (LLC Act) controls. The statute provides for the disassociation of another member under several circumstances including where a member gave notice of withdrawal; where the person is expelled as a member under the operating agreement; or where the member is a corporate entity or partnership that has dissolved or had its charter revoked.
When the parties can’t reach an agreement out of court, an LLC may expel a member by judicial order. Specifically, a New Jersey court may order a member expelled under the following circumstances: (a) the member engaged in wrongful conduct that adversely and materially affected the LLC’s business; (b) the member willfully or persistently committed a material breach of the operating agreement; or (c) the member engaged in conduct relating to the LLC’s business which makes it not reasonably practicable to carry on the business with the member as a member of the LLC.
In IE Test, LLC v. Carroll, the New Jersey Supreme Court addressed the “not reasonably practicable” standard, confirming that LCCs must meet a high bar to be granted judicial expulsion. According to the justices, the New Jersey Legislature did not intend for expulsion to be available whenever “it would be more challenging or complicated for other members to run the business with the LLC member than without him.” Instead, the LLC Act mandates that it must be “unfeasible, despite reasonable efforts, to keep the LLC operating while the disputed member remains affiliated with it.”
As the New Jersey Supreme Court noted, the LLC Act does not define the term “not reasonably practicable,” or specifically describe the conduct that implicates subsection 3(c) of the LLC Act. Accordingly, the Court established a multi-factor test, under which no factor is determinative:
Expelling an LLC member is often fraught with business and legal challenges. Scarinci Hollenbeck’s business litigation attorneys have significant experience resolving LLC disputes, including LLC expulsions. Our experienced attorneys also routinely work with LLCs to draft operating agreements that protect the interests of the LCC members and help prevent protracted legal battles.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!