Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: December 2, 2020
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
Since taking effect on January 1, 2020, the CCPA has faced criticism from both business and consumer privacy groups due to its ambiguity. The Privacy Rights and Enforcement Act seeks to strengthen and clarify the CCPA, as well as establish a dedicated enforcement agency.
Former Gov. Jerry Brown signed the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA) into law on June 28, 2018. Effective January 1, 2020, it grants consumers the right to request that a business disclose the following:
The CCPA also includes a number of other data protections for consumers. It grants a consumer the right to request deletion of PI and mandates that businesses to delete such information upon receipt of a verified request. Consumers also have the right to request that a business that sells the consumer’s PI, or discloses it for a business purpose, disclose the categories of information that it collects and categories of information and the identity of 3rd parties to which the information was sold or disclosed. The CCPA also authorizes a consumer to opt out of the sale of personal information by a business and prohibits the business from discriminating against the consumer for exercising this right.
The CCPA applies to for-profit business entities that conduct business in California, collect consumers’ personal information, alone or jointly with others determine the purposes or means of processing that data, and meet one or more of the following criteria: (1) have annual gross revenues greater than $25 million; (2) buy, receive, sell, or share personal information of 50,000 or more consumers annually; or (3) derive 50 percent or more of its annual revenues from selling consumers’ personal information.
Businesses can face penalties of up to $2,500 for each violation of CCPA requirements. Penalties increase to up to $7,500 for intentional violations. Penalties only may be applied if businesses fail to address the violation within 30 days of being notified of the violation. The California Department of Justice (DOJ) is authorized to impose these penalties.
The CCPA also includes a private right of action. When a breach of personal information occurs due to a business’ failure to implement and maintain reasonable safeguards to protect that information, the law entitles aggrieved consumers to pursue statutory damages of no less than $100 and no more than $750 per consumer per incident, or actual damages, whichever is greater.
On November 3, 2020, California voted to pass the Proposition 24 ballot initiative, which significantly amends the CCPA. Below is a brief summary of the key changes under the California Privacy Rights and Enforcement Act of 2020 (CPRA), which became law with the passage of Proposition 24:
Changes to covered businesses: The CPRA expands the criteria for determining whether businesses are covered under the data privacy law. As amended, the requirements will apply to a business that (1) has greater than $25 million in annual revenue; (2) buys, sells or shares PI of 100,000+ consumers or households; or (3) derives at least 50% of annual revenue from selling or sharing consumer personal information. The CPRA increases the annual threshold to 100,000 or more consumers or households, which will exempt some small businesses. However, businesses that generate most of their revenue from sharing (not just selling) PI are now covered, which expands the reach of the CCPA.
New protections for “sensitive personal information”: The CPRA defines certain types of personal data as “sensitive.” Examples include social security and driver’s license numbers; financial account and login information; precise geolocation; race, ethnicity, religious or philosophical beliefs, or union membership; content of nonpublic communications (mail, email and text messages); genetic data; biometric or health information; and sex life or sexual orientation information. Consumers can direct businesses to limit use of their sensitive personal data only to (1) provide requested services or goods and (2) fulfill key business purposes (such as providing customer service).
New consumer privacy rights: The CPRA creates additional privacy rights. Notably, consumers could direct businesses to not share their personal data and direct businesses to take reasonable efforts to correct personal data that they possess.
Changes to existing penalties: The CPRA establishes a new penalty of up to $7,500 for violations involving the consumer privacy rights of minors. The amendments also remove the ability of businesses to avoid penalties by addressing violations within 30 days of being notified of the violation. Additionally, the CPRA imposes penalties for data breaches of email addresses along with information that would permit access to an account, such as a password. Under the amendments, businesses that suffer data breaches due to the lack of reasonable security procedures can no longer avoid penalties by putting them in place within 30 days after the breach.
New enforcement agency: Proposition 24 establishes the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) to oversee and enforce the state’s consumer privacy laws. CPPA will be governed by a five-member board and have a wide range of responsibilities, including the authority to investigate violations, assess penalties, and develop regulations.
The bulk of the changes mandated under the CPRA are slated to take effect on January 1, 2023. Businesses must begin to understand these new regulations and prepare to comply with the expanded terms.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Maryam Meseha, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!