Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: August 20, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) secured a rare win at trial when a New York jury found former Goldman Sachs Group trader, Fabrice Tourre, committed securities fraud by intentionally misleading investors. The jury also concluded that Tourre aided and abetted an alleged fraud perpetrated by Goldman.
The case involved a failed transaction during the height of the financial crisis. Investors in the collateralized debt obligation, known as Abacus 2007-AC1, were led to believe that hedge fund trader Paulson & Co. was betting on the securities to rise. In reality, Paulson played a role in selecting the mortgage bonds and ultimately bet on them to fail.
In the end, the jury did not buy the defense argument that Tourre, then 28 years old, was a junior trader that was simply following orders. “At the end of the day, he probably could have done the right thing,” one juror told the Wall Street Journal. “But he chose to play the game.” Tourre now faces financial penalties and a ban from the financial-services industry.
For the SEC, this was a “must-win” case, after a dismal record of prosecutions in the wake of the financial crisis. The conviction also lends credibility to the SEC new tougher settlement policy, which will move away from agreements that contain “neither admit nor deny” language and pursue more cases to trial.
Nonetheless, the SEC must still contend with criticism that it can’t or won’t go after the “big fish.” While he held the title of vice president, Tourre was a relatively low-level executive at Goldman.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Jay Surgent, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!