Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
What Does the Tourre Conviction Mean For SEC?
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: August 20, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) secured a rare win at trial when a New York jury found former Goldman Sachs Group trader, Fabrice Tourre, committed securities fraud by intentionally misleading investors. The jury also concluded that Tourre aided and abetted an alleged fraud perpetrated by Goldman.
The case involved a failed transaction during the height of the financial crisis. Investors in the collateralized debt obligation, known as Abacus 2007-AC1, were led to believe that hedge fund trader Paulson & Co. was betting on the securities to rise. In reality, Paulson played a role in selecting the mortgage bonds and ultimately bet on them to fail.
In the end, the jury did not buy the defense argument that Tourre, then 28 years old, was a junior trader that was simply following orders. “At the end of the day, he probably could have done the right thing,” one juror told the Wall Street Journal. “But he chose to play the game.” Tourre now faces financial penalties and a ban from the financial-services industry.
For the SEC, this was a “must-win” case, after a dismal record of prosecutions in the wake of the financial crisis. The conviction also lends credibility to the SEC new tougher settlement policy, which will move away from agreements that contain “neither admit nor deny” language and pursue more cases to trial.
Nonetheless, the SEC must still contend with criticism that it can’t or won’t go after the “big fish.” While he held the title of vice president, Tourre was a relatively low-level executive at Goldman.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Jay Surgent, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
- Locations: New York City, Red Bank, NJ, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
What Does the Tourre Conviction Mean For SEC?
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) secured a rare win at trial when a New York jury found former Goldman Sachs Group trader, Fabrice Tourre, committed securities fraud by intentionally misleading investors. The jury also concluded that Tourre aided and abetted an alleged fraud perpetrated by Goldman.
The case involved a failed transaction during the height of the financial crisis. Investors in the collateralized debt obligation, known as Abacus 2007-AC1, were led to believe that hedge fund trader Paulson & Co. was betting on the securities to rise. In reality, Paulson played a role in selecting the mortgage bonds and ultimately bet on them to fail.
In the end, the jury did not buy the defense argument that Tourre, then 28 years old, was a junior trader that was simply following orders. “At the end of the day, he probably could have done the right thing,” one juror told the Wall Street Journal. “But he chose to play the game.” Tourre now faces financial penalties and a ban from the financial-services industry.
For the SEC, this was a “must-win” case, after a dismal record of prosecutions in the wake of the financial crisis. The conviction also lends credibility to the SEC new tougher settlement policy, which will move away from agreements that contain “neither admit nor deny” language and pursue more cases to trial.
Nonetheless, the SEC must still contend with criticism that it can’t or won’t go after the “big fish.” While he held the title of vice president, Tourre was a relatively low-level executive at Goldman.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Jay Surgent, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.