Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: August 20, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) secured a rare win at trial when a New York jury found former Goldman Sachs Group trader, Fabrice Tourre, committed securities fraud by intentionally misleading investors. The jury also concluded that Tourre aided and abetted an alleged fraud perpetrated by Goldman.
The case involved a failed transaction during the height of the financial crisis. Investors in the collateralized debt obligation, known as Abacus 2007-AC1, were led to believe that hedge fund trader Paulson & Co. was betting on the securities to rise. In reality, Paulson played a role in selecting the mortgage bonds and ultimately bet on them to fail.
In the end, the jury did not buy the defense argument that Tourre, then 28 years old, was a junior trader that was simply following orders. “At the end of the day, he probably could have done the right thing,” one juror told the Wall Street Journal. “But he chose to play the game.” Tourre now faces financial penalties and a ban from the financial-services industry.
For the SEC, this was a “must-win” case, after a dismal record of prosecutions in the wake of the financial crisis. The conviction also lends credibility to the SEC new tougher settlement policy, which will move away from agreements that contain “neither admit nor deny” language and pursue more cases to trial.
Nonetheless, the SEC must still contend with criticism that it can’t or won’t go after the “big fish.” While he held the title of vice president, Tourre was a relatively low-level executive at Goldman.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Jay Surgent, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

In New Jersey, an irrevocable trust can sometimes be modified even though its name suggests otherwise, and one of the primary tools for doing so is a process called decanting. Whether decanting is available depends on the specific terms of the trust and the discretion given to the trustee. Key takeaways: New Jersey has no […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Intellectual property valuation determines the monetary value of a business’s IP assets, and it drives outcomes in licensing deals, joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, financing, and ownership disputes. The most valuable assets of a business are often the things that cannot be seen or touched: a proprietary process, a copyrighted work, brand recognition, or the […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

For New Jersey data center owners and operators, a service agreement may look routine when it is signed. The network is functioning, the vendor is meeting its installation schedule, and the parties have agreed on pricing and performance specifications. The provisions that seem most important at that stage are often the technical ones. That changes […]
Author: George McGowan

The Fort Monmouth redevelopment has entered its execution phase, and it is repositioning the broader Monmouth County real estate market. When Netflix and the Fort Monmouth Economic Revitalization Authority closed on the 292-acre Mega Parcel in December 2025, the transaction did more than hand over a deed. It marked the moment Fort Monmouth stopped being […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Owning a residential rental property in New Jersey involves more than finding tenants and collecting rent. Property owners must comply with a combination of state laws, municipal ordinances, building and housing codes, and zoning and land use regulations. These requirements can affect everything from the number of dwelling units permitted at a property to whether […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

The five most common real estate disputes are breach of contract claims, landlord-tenant conflicts, zoning and land use disagreements, construction claims, and boundary disputes. Understanding why each arises, and taking preventive steps early, can help property owners, tenants, developers, and investors avoid costly litigation. Key Takeaways: Real estate transactions are complex endeavors involving numerous parties […]
Author: Paul Grossman
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!