Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
WASA Studio Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: August 26, 2015
Key Contacts
Back
On August 10, WASA Studio, one of the oldest architecture and engineering firms in the U.S., announced that it had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The company was granted Chapter 11 protection from creditors and its office landlord due to excessive legal expenses.
WASA Studio saddled with legal costs
The legendary firm, known for designing the Grand Central Terminal train station and the Guggenheim Museum, is involved in two breach-of-contract lawsuits where ex-clients are seeking $11 million in total damages. However, according to court papers, WASA is seeking $2.82 million from these former clients for services rendered.
In the bankruptcy filing, WASA Studio also listed several other costly legal disputes, including a lawsuit with a construction company for a building in Bangalore, India. The company sued WASA last year for the return of a $989,000 services fee. The company claimed that these costly legal battles have come at a time when the firm’s business has been slow to recover from the recession, which has reduced project workloads and led to delays in receiving payment for services rendered. As a result, the firm has approximately $2.43 million worth of revenue from its professional services, but posted a net loss of $231,000 after expenses.
According to the Wall Street Journal, WASA Studio listed $5.29 million in assets and a debt total of $3.24 million, as of June 30. The firm’s five largest unsecured creditors include XIN Development Management East LLC for $10 million on a contingent claim, AECOS Ltd. for $988,792 on a contingent claim, Aetna Life Insurance Co. for $137,717 and A. Esteban & Co. for $127,044.
The landlord of WASA Studio, Lafayette Astor Associates LLC, sued the firm for $427,882 for nonpayment of rent at its Broadway office location. Lafayette then notified the firm of its impending eviction for missing its rent payment and sought possession of the premises. The firm had made its payment for June, but missed its July deadline, prompting the two parties to renegotiate a payment agreement that involved WASA making one payment of $225,463 as a judgment for unpaid rent and fees. However, according to a statement by WASA’s Senior Managing Partner Harry Spring, the firm was unable to afford the monthly payment arrangement.
The reorganization plan
Currently, the firm will use Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection to block its landlord from continuing with eviction proceedings from its office location. WASA Studio will then seek buyers to infuse cash into the company to stabilize operations, and look to relocate to a new office location within the same building. There are no prospective buyers listed in bankruptcy papers, nor has a sale price for the firm been determined. However, under bankruptcy law, a sale of the company would need approval from Bankruptcy Judge Michael E. Wiles.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy Litigation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk
For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress
Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey
For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.