Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 2, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe U.S. Treasury Department announced Sept. 22 that it will move to disincentivize the practice of corporate inversions. A corporate inversion occurs when a multi-national business merges with a company overseas to take advantage of the lower tax environment to be had there.
Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew explained to reporters on a conference call that a comprehensive tax reform with anti-inversion provisions would be the best way to stop the practice, but that the Treasury would be rolling out a new set of measures to diminish the tax benefits that companies can obtain via an inversion, according to Fortune Magazine. These measures include eliminating some of the ways companies can gain access to deferred foreign subsidiary earnings without incurring taxes and decreasing the ownership share that owners of the U.S. company may hold in the new combined entity to below 80 percent.
“Inversion transactions erode our corporate tax base, unfairly placing a larger burden on all other taxpayers, including small businesses and hard-working Americans,” Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew said. “It’s critical that this unfair loophole be closed. Now that it’s clear that Congress won’t act before the lame-duck session, we’re taking initial steps that we believe will make companies think twice before undertaking an inversion to try to avoid U.S. taxes.”
CNBC noted that the recently announced Burger King-Tim Hortons deal is still likely to meet these new criteria. While they may kill off some deals that are currently in the works, it is probable that new strategies will appear that allow companies to reduce their tax burden in similar ways without falling foul of the law. The news source quoted an old joke in the corporate tax industry: “What is the difference between legal tax avoidance and illegal tax evasion? One year.”
Follow up on the topic of corporate inversions in the U.S. with some of our previous posts:
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The U.S. Treasury Department announced Sept. 22 that it will move to disincentivize the practice of corporate inversions. A corporate inversion occurs when a multi-national business merges with a company overseas to take advantage of the lower tax environment to be had there.
Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew explained to reporters on a conference call that a comprehensive tax reform with anti-inversion provisions would be the best way to stop the practice, but that the Treasury would be rolling out a new set of measures to diminish the tax benefits that companies can obtain via an inversion, according to Fortune Magazine. These measures include eliminating some of the ways companies can gain access to deferred foreign subsidiary earnings without incurring taxes and decreasing the ownership share that owners of the U.S. company may hold in the new combined entity to below 80 percent.
“Inversion transactions erode our corporate tax base, unfairly placing a larger burden on all other taxpayers, including small businesses and hard-working Americans,” Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew said. “It’s critical that this unfair loophole be closed. Now that it’s clear that Congress won’t act before the lame-duck session, we’re taking initial steps that we believe will make companies think twice before undertaking an inversion to try to avoid U.S. taxes.”
CNBC noted that the recently announced Burger King-Tim Hortons deal is still likely to meet these new criteria. While they may kill off some deals that are currently in the works, it is probable that new strategies will appear that allow companies to reduce their tax burden in similar ways without falling foul of the law. The news source quoted an old joke in the corporate tax industry: “What is the difference between legal tax avoidance and illegal tax evasion? One year.”
Follow up on the topic of corporate inversions in the U.S. with some of our previous posts:
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!