James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
US Corporate Income Tax…Should we take it or should we leave it?
Many have given their input on why should maintain or eliminate the US corporate income tax, and market experts recently provided some compelling arguments on this topic.
Columnist makes case for eliminating the US corporate income tax
On Dec. 29, 2014, Wall Street Journal columnist John Steele Gordon laid out 10 separate reasons for eliminating this tax. He delved into a brief history of the policy, noting that President William Howard Taft convinced Congress to include a tax on corporate profits in the Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act of 1909. At the same time, Taft asked for a constitutional amendment to create a personal income tax.
The author contended that this approach constituted a plan to tax the rich, as they held almost all corporate stock at that point. While the corporate income tax was meant to exist only in the short-term, it ended up being permanent. In addition, the government implemented a personal income tax when it ratified the 16th amendment.
The creation of taxes on both corporate and personal income resulted in the policies surrounding these levies growing increasingly complex, as industry professionals generated solutions to make one type seem like the other, Gordon wrote. Because of this intricate system, the author has singled out greater simplicity as the number one reason to abolish the corporate income tax.
Gordon also argued that if the U.S. government eliminated the corporate income tax, $2 trillion that is currently held overseas would flow back to the world’s largest economy. The companies benefiting from this windfall could potentially harness the funds to boost dividends or increase investment in the nation, noted Forbes contributor Tim Worstall.
If these firms were able to repatriate their earnings and use it either as previously specified, this development would increase income tax revenue and bolster aggregate demand.
The author emphasized that eliminating the corporate income tax would push stock prices higher, which would also put upward pressure on consumer spending.
Counter-arguments for eliminating the US Corporate income tax
While the aforementioned arguments – which are only some of the reasons that Gordon has offered for eliminating the corporate income tax – may sound compelling, James Longstreet wrote in American Thinker that doing away with this duty would inadvertently create various consequences.
He emphasized that a wide range of industries depend on their goods and services being tax deductible, and that many companies that thrive on the current complexity of the tax code could find themselves out of business.
Proposed alternative
Instead, Longstreet has proposed imposing a flat tax with phased-out deductions, expensing and depreciations. He emphasized that providing such a situation would deliver the simplicity that Gordon spoke to, but would not take a heavy toll on the tax industry. Finally, he noted that while creating a corporate income tax rate of zero would eliminate expending, depreciation and other writeoffs, a flat rate would create far fewer complications.
Do you have any thoughts on what we should do regarding the US corporate income tax? Feel free a leave a comment below.
- Practices: Tax, Trusts & Estates, Corporate Tax Planning
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
US Corporate Income Tax...What To Do?
Author: James F. McDonough
US Corporate Income Tax…Should we take it or should we leave it?
Many have given their input on why should maintain or eliminate the US corporate income tax, and market experts recently provided some compelling arguments on this topic.
Columnist makes case for eliminating the US corporate income tax
On Dec. 29, 2014, Wall Street Journal columnist John Steele Gordon laid out 10 separate reasons for eliminating this tax. He delved into a brief history of the policy, noting that President William Howard Taft convinced Congress to include a tax on corporate profits in the Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act of 1909. At the same time, Taft asked for a constitutional amendment to create a personal income tax.
The author contended that this approach constituted a plan to tax the rich, as they held almost all corporate stock at that point. While the corporate income tax was meant to exist only in the short-term, it ended up being permanent. In addition, the government implemented a personal income tax when it ratified the 16th amendment.
The creation of taxes on both corporate and personal income resulted in the policies surrounding these levies growing increasingly complex, as industry professionals generated solutions to make one type seem like the other, Gordon wrote. Because of this intricate system, the author has singled out greater simplicity as the number one reason to abolish the corporate income tax.
Gordon also argued that if the U.S. government eliminated the corporate income tax, $2 trillion that is currently held overseas would flow back to the world’s largest economy. The companies benefiting from this windfall could potentially harness the funds to boost dividends or increase investment in the nation, noted Forbes contributor Tim Worstall.
If these firms were able to repatriate their earnings and use it either as previously specified, this development would increase income tax revenue and bolster aggregate demand.
The author emphasized that eliminating the corporate income tax would push stock prices higher, which would also put upward pressure on consumer spending.
Counter-arguments for eliminating the US Corporate income tax
While the aforementioned arguments – which are only some of the reasons that Gordon has offered for eliminating the corporate income tax – may sound compelling, James Longstreet wrote in American Thinker that doing away with this duty would inadvertently create various consequences.
He emphasized that a wide range of industries depend on their goods and services being tax deductible, and that many companies that thrive on the current complexity of the tax code could find themselves out of business.
Proposed alternative
Instead, Longstreet has proposed imposing a flat tax with phased-out deductions, expensing and depreciations. He emphasized that providing such a situation would deliver the simplicity that Gordon spoke to, but would not take a heavy toll on the tax industry. Finally, he noted that while creating a corporate income tax rate of zero would eliminate expending, depreciation and other writeoffs, a flat rate would create far fewer complications.
Do you have any thoughts on what we should do regarding the US corporate income tax? Feel free a leave a comment below.