
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: August 8, 2013
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comTrustees had been governed by the Reasonable Man standard for investing trust assets that were designed to preserve principal and avoid risk. Then, Modern Portfolio Theory came into prominence and the Reasonable Man rule fell into disfavor. Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT), supported by the work of Nobel Laureates, became the prevailing theory. In the most simple of terms, MPT requires diversification by allocating capital among asset classes or sectors so as to minimize risk.
The Uniform Prudent Investor Act (UPIA) incorporates MPT that requires trustees to diversify investment portfolios. Diversification is achieved through statistical methods that are designed to minimize investment risk, through the selection of securities that respond differently to market changes. MPT notes that some stocks react, up or down, in lockstep with the market index. Defensive stocks, such as utilities, do not decline as rapidly in bad markets and do not rise as rapidly as the market in good times as the index. A diversified mix of stocks among unrelated sectors minimizes the overall risk of loss to the trust assets. MPT believes that risk can be minimized for any targeted level of returns.
The rule of UPIA can be overridden by the Trustee. A Grantor may leave a closely-held business in a trust and therefore must allow for the holding of a concentrated position by the trust. Not every successful investor uses MPT. Warren Buffet distains MPT and at one time had one-third of his portfolio in the stock of Coca Cola.
The Uniform Trust Code (UTC) is a comprehensive statute designed to improve state trust law. UTC Section 404 demands the trust “benefit the beneficiaries,” a rule that can cause conflict with a Grantor’s instructions to the Trustee. Imagine a trustee, bound by the instructions of the Grantor who waived the application of MPT as permitted by UPIA, and now faces a challenge based upon the UTC. The problem is that the UTC gives beneficiaries a reasonable basis to mount a challenge that will overturn the Grantor’s instructions to the Trustee. The beneficiaries may claim that the trust, as administered, does not meet their needs, disregarding what is written in the trust instrument. The beneficiaries may also claim the Grantor’s instructions to the Trustee represents control from the grave that prevents the trust from adapting to current circumstances and being administered for their benefit. Not every potential conflict is be resolved by uniform legislation.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
NYC Real Estate and Litigation Attorney Ryan O. Miller and Team Join Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC New York City, NY – August 13, 2025 – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC has strengthened its Real Estate and Litigation practices with the addition of four New York City-based attorneys. Ryan Miller, who joins as a partner, is well known for […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Business law plays a critical role in nearly every aspect of running a successful enterprise, from negotiating a commercial lease to drafting employee policies to fulfilling corporate disclosure obligations. Understanding what is business law and your legal obligations can help your business run smoothly and build productive relationships with clients, business partners, regulators, and others. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!