Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: July 28, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comTreasury Secretary Jacob Lew sent letters to the top lawmakers on the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee on July 15, in an attempt to effect action on the issue of corporate tax inversions, according to The New York Times. Inversions are the controversial – but popular – practice of merging with a foreign company in order to take advantage of a lower tax rate abroad.
Despite Lew’s entreaties, the recent wave of inversions seems unlikely to slow down, with Congress unwilling or unable to make laws on the matter and Wall Street financial advisors continuing to encourage the practice, the news source reported. Two particularly large inversions appeared all but stamped and signed this week. Chicago-based drug maker AbbVie won tentative approval to acquire Ireland-based Shire for $53 billion, and Mylan, another U.S. drug maker, paid $5.3 billion for the European assets of Abbott Laboratories.
“What we need as a nation is a new sense of economic patriotism, where we all rise or fall together,” Lew wrote, according to the LA Times. “We should not be providing support for corporations that seek to shift their profits overseas to avoid paying their fair share of taxes.”
Lew went on to explain that the U.S. multinational corporations that are undergoing inversions continue to benefit from their business locations in the United States, the U.S. protection of intellectual property rights, support for research and development, infrastructure and investment climate, all of which is funded by taxpayer dollars, the news source wrote. Chris Krueger, a senior analyst at Guggenheim Partners explained that no real consensus exists among Democrats on the topic of inversions, and that the Republican consensus is against acting on the practice outside of the context of broader corporate tax reform.
With only 24 legislative days before the November elections, it is highly unlikely that Congress will act on the issue in the near future.
Tax inversion is a hot-topic as more and more US companies try this strategy to avoid income tax. Find out more about this topic here:
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew sent letters to the top lawmakers on the House Ways and Means Committee and the Senate Finance Committee on July 15, in an attempt to effect action on the issue of corporate tax inversions, according to The New York Times. Inversions are the controversial – but popular – practice of merging with a foreign company in order to take advantage of a lower tax rate abroad.
Despite Lew’s entreaties, the recent wave of inversions seems unlikely to slow down, with Congress unwilling or unable to make laws on the matter and Wall Street financial advisors continuing to encourage the practice, the news source reported. Two particularly large inversions appeared all but stamped and signed this week. Chicago-based drug maker AbbVie won tentative approval to acquire Ireland-based Shire for $53 billion, and Mylan, another U.S. drug maker, paid $5.3 billion for the European assets of Abbott Laboratories.
“What we need as a nation is a new sense of economic patriotism, where we all rise or fall together,” Lew wrote, according to the LA Times. “We should not be providing support for corporations that seek to shift their profits overseas to avoid paying their fair share of taxes.”
Lew went on to explain that the U.S. multinational corporations that are undergoing inversions continue to benefit from their business locations in the United States, the U.S. protection of intellectual property rights, support for research and development, infrastructure and investment climate, all of which is funded by taxpayer dollars, the news source wrote. Chris Krueger, a senior analyst at Guggenheim Partners explained that no real consensus exists among Democrats on the topic of inversions, and that the Republican consensus is against acting on the practice outside of the context of broader corporate tax reform.
With only 24 legislative days before the November elections, it is highly unlikely that Congress will act on the issue in the near future.
Tax inversion is a hot-topic as more and more US companies try this strategy to avoid income tax. Find out more about this topic here:
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!