Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 18, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFlexible spending accounts have historically been less popular with Americans than health savings accounts, due to a “use it or lose it” provision that requires account holders to forfeit any unused balances at the end of their plan year. However, a new adjustment to FSAs that was announced in October by the Treasury Department and the IRS may change that.

The government agency recently modified the forfeiture rule, and will now allow individuals to carry over up to $500 of their remaining balances at the end of the plan year. The new tax law is designed to generate greater interest in these tax-advantaged plans, allow workers to keep a greater portion of their balances, and reduce unnecessary medical spending at the end of the year, the Treasury Department said.
Existing rules also give employers the option of allowing employees a grace period that permits them to use amounts remaining unused at the end of a year to pay qualified FSA expenses incurred for up to two and a half months following year-end. While this rule will remain in place, plan participants may not employ both a carryover and a grace period. They must choose one or the other.
“Across the administration, we are always looking for ways to provide added flexibility and commonsense solutions to how people pay for their healthcare,” said Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew. “Today’s announcement is a step forward for hardworking Americans who wisely plan for health care expenses for the coming year.”
According to the agency, roughly 14 million Americans participate in FSAs, and analysts are eager to see if the change will prompt an increase in participants. This is currently unclear, because employers are not required to adopt the new benefit and may continue with existing forfeiture rules if they wish. A large number of employers currently offer FSAs as a method of providing assistance to workers in covering qualifying out-of-pocket medical expenses, while also earning valuable tax breaks for the company.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!