Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 18, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFlexible spending accounts have historically been less popular with Americans than health savings accounts, due to a “use it or lose it” provision that requires account holders to forfeit any unused balances at the end of their plan year. However, a new adjustment to FSAs that was announced in October by the Treasury Department and the IRS may change that.

The government agency recently modified the forfeiture rule, and will now allow individuals to carry over up to $500 of their remaining balances at the end of the plan year. The new tax law is designed to generate greater interest in these tax-advantaged plans, allow workers to keep a greater portion of their balances, and reduce unnecessary medical spending at the end of the year, the Treasury Department said.
Existing rules also give employers the option of allowing employees a grace period that permits them to use amounts remaining unused at the end of a year to pay qualified FSA expenses incurred for up to two and a half months following year-end. While this rule will remain in place, plan participants may not employ both a carryover and a grace period. They must choose one or the other.
“Across the administration, we are always looking for ways to provide added flexibility and commonsense solutions to how people pay for their healthcare,” said Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew. “Today’s announcement is a step forward for hardworking Americans who wisely plan for health care expenses for the coming year.”
According to the agency, roughly 14 million Americans participate in FSAs, and analysts are eager to see if the change will prompt an increase in participants. This is currently unclear, because employers are not required to adopt the new benefit and may continue with existing forfeiture rules if they wish. A large number of employers currently offer FSAs as a method of providing assistance to workers in covering qualifying out-of-pocket medical expenses, while also earning valuable tax breaks for the company.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!