Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Test Preparation Company Seeks Bankruptcy Protection
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: January 29, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Education Holdings filing for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection
High school and college students, who are preparing for the SAT and GRE tests in the hope of getting into a good school, now have – at least temporarily – one fewer option when choosing a test preparation company, as one popular service provider has filed for bankruptcy protection.
Education Holdings 1 Inc., formerly known as the Princeton Review, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection under bankruptcy law in a Delaware courtroom. The filing is a “pre-pack,” meaning that at least some of the creditors have already at least informally agreed to the debtor’s proposed plan of reorganization. The filing comes one month after the test-prep service settled fraud allegations with the United States. The company listed both assets and liabilities of between $100 million and $500 million. The company said it has specific plans to reorganize and expects to borrow between $4 million and $7 million to assist its efforts while it goes through the bankruptcy process.
Education Holdings’ prepackaged reorganization plan must be voted on by its senior secured claim holders, who are owed at least $36.3 million, second-lien facility claimants due $7 million, and other note holders owed more than $110 million, according to Bloomberg. If these entities formally agree with the terms of the reorganization plan, it will then be subject to court approval. Bain Capital Venture Fund LP was listed as the company’s biggest equity security holder, with a 9.7 percent stake. Falcon Investment Advisors LLC and Sankaty Advisors LLC are the biggest unsecured creditors, with each owed $56.3 million, Bloomberg notes.
The company agreed to a $10 million fraud settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice in December. The federal agency filed a lawsuit against Education Holdings in May, alleging that it accepted tens of millions of dollars in federal funds to provide tutoring and educational services to New York City school children that it failed to deliver.
A separate company, TPR Education LLC, is now operating as the Princeton Review, and is not part of these bankruptcy proceedings.
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy Litigation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk
For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.