
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: December 9, 2015

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comTaylor-Wharton International LLC, a major designer and manufacturer of cryogenic equipment, announced that it had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. According to a Law 360 report, the company plans to hold an asset auction sale with Haier Medical and Laboratory Products USA Inc. serving as the stalking horse bidders for $24 million in cash, with the winning bidders assuming most of Taylor-Wharton’s debt liabilities.
In its bankruptcy petition, Taylor-Wharton stated the fact that it had not fully recovered from its previous Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing in 2009. In turn, the company could not effectively streamline its operations to achieve profitability, despite multiple new capital infusions and the sale of a portion of its subsidiaries. According to Law 360, Taylor-Wharton listed debt totals between $100 million and $500 million and assets within the same range in its court papers.
After it emerged from bankruptcy in 2010, the company operated one U.S. manufacturing plant located in Alabama, as well as subsidiary operations in China, Malaysia, Slovakia, Australia and Germany. There is no word yet on whether these overseas operations will continue after the company’s auction sale.
The company has filed the usual first-day motions, including requests to the court to continue to compensate employees and vendors. These also include motions to block utilities from halting service and to continue management of company bank accounts.
Taylor-Wharton also stated that the company intends to sell its primary manufacturing plant in Alabama in addition to other assets. Further, the company will file a motion to establish the bidding process for a stalking horse sale with Haier Medical providing the initial offer for the $24 million CryoScience division. The winning bidder will also enter an agreement to assume ownership of a portion of Taylor-Wharton’s debt load.
The firm’s objective is to sell all of its remaining assets during the bankruptcy period. This will also involve equity in the company’s foreign subsidiaries, which are not associated with Taylor-Wharton’s debt liabilities.
Further, Taylor-Wharton plans to use debtor-in-possession financing with a revolving facility up to $13.8 million. This financing will be used to maintain operations for its 164 employees.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!