New Fiduciary Law Addresses Who Manages One’s Digital Assets After They Die
Have you ever wondered what happens to your email account when you die? What about your PayPal account? New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie recently signed legislation into law that addresses who can manage a person’s digital assets when they die or become legally incapacitated.
As technology grows, so does the number of digital assets that Americans own. Examples include email accounts, blogs, social media accounts, virtual currency, online financial accounts, websites, domain names, and computing hardware. However, most estate laws only address tangible assets.
“If a custodial party wants to guard their digital assets, they should be able to without regulatory barriers. Digital property such as email accounts, social media accounts and Internet-based currency is just as important as any other asset a person may have,” said the lead sponsor, Assembly Majority Leader Louis Greenwald, D-Camden. “This will help individuals protect digital properties as they would their physical assets.”
Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act
New Jersey’s Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act (UFADAA) authorizes an executor, agent, guardian, or trustee to manage the electronic records of a decedent, principal, incapacitated person, or trust creator under certain circumstances. It is modeled after legislation proposed by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in 2014. To date, 23 other states have enacted similar laws, and another 18 are in the process of doing so. Below is a brief summary of several key provisions:
Definition of “Digital Assets”: The new law defines the term “digital assets” to mean a person’s digital property and electronic communications. It does not include an underlying asset or liability unless the asset or liability is itself an electronic record. It would also not apply to digital assets of an employer used by an employee during the ordinary course of business.
Authority of Fiduciary: The UFADAA authorizes fiduciaries, which may include executors or administrators of deceased persons’ estates, court-appointed guardians of incapacitated persons, agents appointed under powers of attorney, and trustees, to manage digital property, such as computer files, web domains, and virtual currency. However, it restricts a fiduciary’s access to electronic communications such as email, text messages, and social media accounts unless the original user (i.e., accountholder) consented in a will, trust, power of attorney, or other record. It further provides that a fiduciary would generally have access to a catalogue of the user’s communications (i.e. information that identifies each person with which a user has had an electronic communication, and the time and date of that communication), but not the content, unless the user consented to the disclosure of the content.
Accessing Digital Assets: If the user has not provided any direction, either online or in an estate plan, the terms of service for the user’s account would determine whether a fiduciary may access the user’s digital assets. If the terms of service do not address fiduciary access, the UFADDA’s default rules apply. Specifically, a fiduciary would be required to send a request to the custodian, accompanied by a copy of the document granting fiduciary authority, such as a letter of appointment, court order, or certification of trust.
Fiduciary Duties: Under the new law, fiduciaries for digital assets would be subject to the same fiduciary duties that normally apply to tangible assets. For instance, an executor would not be authorized to publish the decedent’s confidential communications or impersonate the decedent by sending email from the decedent’s account.
Relationship to Other Laws: The UFADAA acknowledges that a fiduciary’s management of digital assets may also be limited by other law. For example, a fiduciary may not copy or distribute digital files in violation of copyright law, and may not exceed the user’s authority under the account’s terms of service.
Liability: Custodians of digital assets are immune from any liability for an act or omission done in good faith in compliance with the UFADDA.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Jeffrey Pittard, at 201-806-3364.
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
