Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 25, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFollowing the announcement of several international tax agreements and a higher level of scrutiny over corporate tax strategies, Ireland recently announced its plans to close a tax loophole that a number of companies – most notably Apple, Inc. – have used to significantly lower their tax liabilities.
Ireland’s Department of Finance released a new report detailing its 2014 international tax strategies, in which it declared a “change to our company residence rules aimed at eliminating mismatches – that can exist between tax treaty partners in certain circumstances – being used to allow companies to be ‘stateless’ in terms of their place of tax residence.”
Currently, Apple runs all of its non-US income through two Irish companies, one of which is classified as a tax resident and domiciled in Ireland. The other, however, is not domiciled or considered a tax resident anywhere. Apple is then able to avoid paying roughly $40 billion in taxes by funneling money into the first Irish company, and then passing the funds over as royalties and fees to the second, which is not subject to any national tax jurisdiction, Forbes explained. Ireland’s new rule will make it illegal for any company registered in the country to maintain that “stateless” status to avoid taxes.
However, closing the loophole does not necessarily mean corporations will be required by law to pay higher taxes. In fact, many analysts agreed that nothing would likely change. Although Irish Finance Minister Michael Noonan said that the country will close the loophole, it will keep in place a provision that enables corporations to nominate any country they prefer as their tax residence, according to Reuters. This includes popular zero tax jurisdictions, such as Bermuda, which is a prime choice for companies such as Google, Amazon, and other tech giants.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!