Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 9, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comPolicy analysts have repeatedly advocated changing tax policy for both of these two groups, but corporate income taxes in particular have generated significant visibility in recent months.
Morici, an economist and professor at the University of Maryland’s Robert H. Smith School of Business, asserted that the current policy affecting these corporate levies results in several negative consequences, including a complex system full of exemptions and deductions.
This intricate framework has resulted in lawmakers providing equally complex proposals, for example one the author cited as having an executive summary 194 pages long. This plan, which would require specific education and expertise to understand, was tabled by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman David Camp.
A wide range of lawmakers, academics and policy analysts have proposed reforms that would simplify and or reduce corporate income tax rates, but these plans have failed to receive approval.
Earlier this year, President Barack Obama proposed cutting the corporate income tax rate and making it easier for global companies to repatriate their foreign earnings. Currently, these or businesses have an incentive to keep these profits, which are generated overseas, where they were earned in the first place.
By making it more difficult for these organizations to bring this money back home, many analysts assert that current policy is holding up investment and job creation in the U.S. Morici specifically mentioned this problem in his commentary piece, emphasizing that unless they move their production facilities overseas, many companies based in the U.S. will end up paying higher taxes than their foreign competitors.
This current policy negatively impacts the nation’s jobs market, and while Morici emphasized that many have proposed tax reform with good intentions, the simplest way to address these challenges would be to eliminate income taxes for both corporations and individuals.
To replace the $1.7 trillion these levies brought the U.S. federal government in 2014, he suggested imposing a 12 percent sales tax affecting all private purchases and other payments. Under such a plan, corporations would subtract any taxes paid for items they bought from taxes they collected and then provide this amount to the U.S. Department of Treasury.
Corporations would be able to lower expenses because they would no longer need to value their inventories, and they would also have the ability to avoid double taxation, Morici noted.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!