James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Tax Foundation Ranks US Tax Code 31 Out of 34 Developed Nations
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: September 23, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
The Tax Foundation, a think tank that examines issues of public tax policy, released a new report ranking the tax codes of the 34 developed countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
The U.S. was ranked poorly, coming in at number 31 out of 34, according to Business Insider. Estonia, New Zealand and Switzerland came in at Nos. 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Only Portugal and France were ranked below the U.S.
“The United States scores poorly largely because it maintains the highest corporate tax rate in the developed world at 39.1 percent and is one of the six remaining countries in the OECD with a worldwide system of taxation,” the Tax Foundation said, according to the news source. “Its poorly structured property, individual, and capital gains and dividends taxes also contribute to the low ranking.”
Estonia in particular was praised for having “the most competitive” tax code in the developed world, including a 21 percent tax rate for individuals and corporations. The U.S. corporate income tax is 35 percent, a level that has received criticism for being one of the highest in the developed world.
While the Tax Foundation maintains that it is non-partisan, a number of left-leaning figures have alleged that the think tank holds a conservative slant. Notably, Paul Krugman has accused the organization of a pro-business agenda in a piece titled, The Greek menace.
Whether the think tank maintains a slant or not, this recent report highlights the importance of taxation issues in America. Corporate inversions in particular have drawn heavy criticism for taking tax dollars out of the country. As the November elections draw closer, expect to see further rhetoric from all sides.
Interested in reading more about tax codes? Check out tax attorneys, Frank L. Brunetti’s Overhaul of Corporate Tax Code Proposed and Joseph M. Donegan’s Businesses Cite Tax Code Uncertainty as a Critical Problem
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.