
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: February 11, 2016

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comRecently, Swift Energy, the large-scale oil and gas producer, announced that it had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. According to The Wall Street Journal, the company became just the latest casualty of the collapse of oil prices in 2015. As part of its bankruptcy petition, the company will sell off a portion of its remaining assets, but it reached an agreement with bondholders to refinance its operations.
In bankruptcy documents, the company and its eight subsidiaries cited record losses as the result of the historic decline in oil prices. According to Fuel Fix, Swift Energy was driven into insolvency after it accrued a debt total of close to $1.2 billion with only $1 billion in assets.
Following the company’s grace period from its December interest payments with bondholders, Swift Energy announced that its offshore operations as well as its onshore wells in Louisiana and Texas had amassed $50 million in trade debt. According to the Journal, the company was forced to sell off a 75 percent stake in its wells in Louisiana to Texegy LLC below market value. Even so, it still could not afford its December interest payments.
Its financial struggles culminated when trading in its common stock was suspended on the New York Stock Exchange Dec. 18. Petro Global News reported that it will eventually be delisted due to “abnormally low” share prices.
As part of its restructuring proposal, the company will conduct a debt-for-equity exchange with senior bondholders. The Journal reported that this deal will swap Swift Energy’s $905 million bond debt for control over its operations. It also calls for a 4 percent equity allocation for existing shareholders in the company after it emerges from bankruptcy. These shareholders will also receive warrants valued at up to 30 percent of the post-petition equity that can be exercised if the company achieves benchmarks listed in the agreement.
The company has also secured up to $75 million in debtor-in-possession financing from its senior bondholders to support its current operations and ensure that it can make royalty and interest payments to creditors. In turn, Swift Energy also negotiated a $330 million pre-petition deal with secured lenders to provide it with a credit facility in its reorganization.
Upon court approval of its bankruptcy plan, the company plans to emerge from the reorganization as a viable business.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!