
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: February 11, 2016

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comRecently, Swift Energy, the large-scale oil and gas producer, announced that it had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. According to The Wall Street Journal, the company became just the latest casualty of the collapse of oil prices in 2015. As part of its bankruptcy petition, the company will sell off a portion of its remaining assets, but it reached an agreement with bondholders to refinance its operations.
In bankruptcy documents, the company and its eight subsidiaries cited record losses as the result of the historic decline in oil prices. According to Fuel Fix, Swift Energy was driven into insolvency after it accrued a debt total of close to $1.2 billion with only $1 billion in assets.
Following the company’s grace period from its December interest payments with bondholders, Swift Energy announced that its offshore operations as well as its onshore wells in Louisiana and Texas had amassed $50 million in trade debt. According to the Journal, the company was forced to sell off a 75 percent stake in its wells in Louisiana to Texegy LLC below market value. Even so, it still could not afford its December interest payments.
Its financial struggles culminated when trading in its common stock was suspended on the New York Stock Exchange Dec. 18. Petro Global News reported that it will eventually be delisted due to “abnormally low” share prices.
As part of its restructuring proposal, the company will conduct a debt-for-equity exchange with senior bondholders. The Journal reported that this deal will swap Swift Energy’s $905 million bond debt for control over its operations. It also calls for a 4 percent equity allocation for existing shareholders in the company after it emerges from bankruptcy. These shareholders will also receive warrants valued at up to 30 percent of the post-petition equity that can be exercised if the company achieves benchmarks listed in the agreement.
The company has also secured up to $75 million in debtor-in-possession financing from its senior bondholders to support its current operations and ensure that it can make royalty and interest payments to creditors. In turn, Swift Energy also negotiated a $330 million pre-petition deal with secured lenders to provide it with a credit facility in its reorganization.
Upon court approval of its bankruptcy plan, the company plans to emerge from the reorganization as a viable business.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!