Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Summit Entertainment, Lions Gate Sued by 'Twilight' Parodists for $500 Million
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: June 7, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Summit Entertainment and Lions Gate sued by Between the Lines Productions, the popular producers of several “Twilight” parodies over accusations that the makers of the teen franchise derailed the release of another parody film.
In a 219-page document filed with the court, Between the Lines argues that it was engaged in talks with several movie distributors about the release of another parody film “Twiharder.” However, Lions Gate’s Summit Entertainment sent a cease-and-desist letter accusing the parody producer of entertainment law violations, including copyright and trademark infringement.
In court documents, Between the Lines argues that, as a result of the cease-and-desist letter – which it says is unjustified – the distributors revoked their offers to work with the company.
“The ‘Twiharder’ film commits wholesale trademark and copyright infringement,” Summit wrote in an email to Between the Lines Productions after a private screening of the parody film, according to the Los Angeles Times. “Not only does the film use the confusingly similar trademark ‘Twiharder,’ it also uses an identical font style, color, artwork and graphics contained in (original ‘Twilight’) films, DVDs and merchandise, the same storyline verbatim and dialogue, similar costumes and character names, and myriad scenic, visual, and musical references to the films.”
The company says Lions Gate is attempting to hold a monopoly over the Twilight sagas by blocking other legitimate producers from creating new works based on the series, and that Between the Lines should be permitted to release the movie under the “fair use” doctrine. The law protects independent filmmakers, parodists, and other artists, and enables the production of films and other “separate or derivative works that may be related to, inspired by or comment upon the pop culture events that dominate the national Cineplex,” the Times reports.
In its lawsuit, Between the Lines Productions accuses Lions Gate and Summit of violating federal intellectual property and anti-trust laws, and is suing the entertainment behemoths for $500 million in damages.
- Industries: Entertainment & Media
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.