Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
States Increase Scrutiny on Construction Companies That Mislabel Workers
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 4, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The construction industry was one of the hardest-hit sectors when the recession struck, and state investigations indicate that many contracting firms may have broken federal and state tax laws by mislabeling employees as independent contractors.
The tax treatment for contractors differs greatly from that of employees, as companies that employ the former are not required to withhold payroll taxes, make Social Security and Medicare tax payments to authorities, or provide health and retirement benefits. However, misclassification of workers comes with a number of federal and state penalties, which include fines, tax payments, interest and, in more severe cases, legal action.
Many states suffering from budget constraints have now taken a more proactive approach toward discovering and penalizing that companies that skirt their tax obligations through mislabeling workers, especially as these crimes cost states millions in potential tax revenue. For instance, Connecticut conducted a 12-month audit of its construction sector, which prompted it to reclassify 3,487 workers and uncover $68.2 million in unreported payroll, representing $1.3 million in lost payroll taxes, Bloomberg reported. Earlier in 2013, New York officials announced that an investigation found 20,200 instances of workers treated as contractors in 2012, representing more than $282.5 million in unreported wages, the news source added.
As states come to realize the prevalence of this problem across a number of industries, more are introducing or updating worker misclassification laws to curb the issue and strengthen their ability to prosecute companies. One issue that some employers find is that the guidelines that govern worker classification can be hazy, making it difficult to determine whether the employee or contractor status applies.
With more states investigating companies and the job market growing, companies that are uncertain of how to classify individuals might benefit from consulting a legal professional. Gaining a firmer understanding of state and federal rules may help lower the risk of tax issues in the future.
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates, Corporate Transactions & Business
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits
High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies
Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights
Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities
Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Why Compliance Monitoring Matters for NY and NJ Businesses
Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher
When Are New Jersey Business Owners Personally Liable for Corporate Debt?
New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.