
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: November 15, 2017

Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comA special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) is created for the sole purpose of raising capital, usually through an IPO, and using those funds to acquire or merge with an existing private company. The unique business structure essentially allows investors to pool their money together to acquire a “company to be named later.” This is tantamount to being an insider in a private equity fund deal, with the benefits of a daily exit opportunity and regulatory and disclosure rules providing some protections on the downside. As long as its net tangible assets exceed $5 million, a SPAC is exempt from regulation as a “blank check” company under the Rule 419 prohibition of trading until an acquisition occurs.

In the 1980’s, after some abusive penny stock schemes and other forms of investment fraud, so-called “blank check” companies got a bad name. However, with the advent of better regulatory rules and supervision, SPACs have been steadily growing in popularity and legitimacy over subsequent decades.
Earlier this year, TPG Pace Energy Holdings became the first SPAC to be listed on the main NYSE market. The SPAC, which is operated by energy industry executive Steve Chazen, floated 60 million shares at $10 on the NYSE. In July, the parent company of cannabis-industry magazine High Times became a public company without needing to conduct an IPO after being acquired by a SPAC.
SPACs are typically formed by seasoned executives that have experience running profitable public companies. After all, given that a SPAC is essentially a shell company, the founders/management team is the primary selling point when seeking investors.
Sponsors, often the management team, provide the initial capital to form a SPAC. They typically hold a 20 percent equity stake in the SPAC and, therefore, stand to obtain a sizable stake in the acquired public company.
During the IPO, securities are offered at a unit price, often $10 per unit. Each unit represents one or more shares of common stock and one or more warrants exercisable for one share of common stock, usually at or near the offering price and exercisable for a significant period after the acquisition. Since the company has no performance history, revenue, or business plan, the prospectus focuses almost exclusively on the SPAC sponsors and would include information about the specific target industry.
While SPACs benefit from a streamlined registration review process, there are several strict SEC registration and disclosure requirements to satisfy. SPACs are required to meet market cap listing rules, as well as having number of holders purchasing required amounts of securities in the offering. The offering must also be reviewed and approved FINRA, and a “no objection” letter obtained from FINRA. FINRA review is primarily for issues related to underwriter compensation and related matters. The funds raised through the SPAC’s IPO are placed into a trust account administered by a third-party trustee. The money is held in the trust account until the SPAC identifies and closes on a potential merger or acquisition target. Expenses and underwriting fees associated with the IPO are covered through a private placement of warrants to insiders. SPACs must avoid any contact with potential target businesses before and during the IPO.
Once the IPO is completed, the management of the IPO has a set amount of time, typically 18 or 24 months, to complete a merger or acquisition. The target business must have a fair market value that is equal to at least 80 percent of the SPAC’s trust assets. Investors are generally sent proxy materials regarding the acquisition and have a say in whether the deal should be consummated.
Investors who vote against an acquisition are entitled to a pro rata return of the funds held in escrow. In addition, should the SPAC fail to come to terms with a private company within the specified timeframe, the IPO revenues are returned to investors in pro rata shares.
Special purpose acquisition company IPOs differ significantly from traditional equity IPOs, and it is important for investors and business professionals to understand the difference.
For investors, the primary risk is that SPAC managers will err in choosing a target that uses the SPAC’s capital to effect a business plan that fails. There is also the risk that the SPAC management will fail to acquire a private company. However, because all investor funds are held in escrow and must be returned in the event there is no acquisition, there is significant downside protection in that regard. And then, there is always a market risk if the acquired business fails or from a down market, even if a quality transaction eventuates.
The upsides for investors include the ability to sell their securities on the secondary market while awaiting a merger or acquisition. There is a specified deadline to consummate a transaction, and investors not only have a say in the final deal but can also opt out of a proposed deal and elect to receive reimbursement of their funds. For traders, these deals offer a potential and relatively quick profit: the securities sold in the IPO are usually structured in units with separable shares and warrants. This means that a trading market in the SPAC securities will consist of these pieces trading separately, and the total value of the separately trading pieces will often exceed the IPO offering price, particularly in a stable market when a deal is announced.
For target companies, there are also several benefits. In most cases, merging with a SPAC is quicker and less costly than conducting a traditional IPO because the SPAC has already done the funding and most of the regulatory legwork. While the target company becomes subject to meeting the numerous quarterly, annual and other public filing reporting requirements, including costly accounting reporting, the target company management is relieved of the time-consuming funding effort and can promptly proceed with effecting the business plan to grow the business and increase market value. Additional funding avenues at improved rates, an existing shareholder base, better banking relationships and new attractive employee incentive plans are important considerations for target companies being offered a SPAC funded merger. SPACs are being used in industry combinations and industry roll-ups, and are often still active and available to target companies when the IPO market cools off. The target company can also often benefit from the SPACs’ experienced management and industry professionals.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Dan Brecher, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!