Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 18, 2025
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
In December, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced charges against two privately held companies for failing to file a Form D notice, which is generally utilized for exempt securities offerings. Here, the SEC’s enforcement sends a strong message: compliance with regulatory requirements is not optional and failure to comply can have significant consequences.
Securities offerings in the United States must either be registered under the Securities Act or qualify for a registration exemption. One of the most popular exemptions is Regulation D, which provides a safe harbor from registration requirements. To qualify for exemption under Regulation D, the issuer of unregistered securities must file a notice of sale via a Form D filing no later than 15 calendar days after the first sale in a private offering. This filing provides the SEC the essential information about the issuer and the offering to allow for the monitoring of the private securities offerings.
While previously considered by many to be a technicality, these recent enforcement actions highlight that failure to comply with Rule 503 of Regulation D now carries real risk.
For years, many issuers believed they could avoid SEC enforcement actions even though they did not comply with the filing of Form D and/or deviating from other Regulation D requirements. Previously issued guidance from the SEC’s Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations provided that while a Form D filing is a requirement of Rule 503, it is not a condition to the availability of an exemption pursuant to Rule 504 or 506 of Regulation D. This discrepancy gave rise to an informal understanding that the SEC would not initiate an enforcement action solely for the failure to file a Form D. As a result, many issuers conducted private offerings without making the Form D filing or with some other purported “insignificant deviations” from the Regulation D requirements, as the issuers considered the possibility of a SEC enforcement action to be low to nonexistent. However, the recent enforcement actions indicate a shift in the SEC’s approach. Whether this approach continues with the new administration remains to be seen.
The SEC’s enforcement actions against Pipe Technologies Inc. and Underdog Sports Holdings, Inc. serve as cautionary tales for issuers:
Both companies not only failed to file Form D, but they also engaged in general solicitation, further limiting their available exemptions under Regulation D. The SEC imposed sanctions, including cease-and-desist orders and civil penalties, all of which underscore the serious consequences of non-compliance.
The SEC justified its actions against these two issuers on the basis that timely Form D filings help maintain transparency in the private capital markets by providing the SEC with important information about private securities offerings and ensure investor protection.
These actions by the SEC may also encourage state regulators to increase scrutiny and enforcement of their own blue sky laws, further raising the stakes for non-compliant issuers. If you are considering raising capital through private securities offerings, it is important that you consult with a securities attorney and take the necessary precautions:
Failing to file Form D might seem like a minor oversight, but as these SEC enforcement actions demonstrate, it can lead to serious repercussions. Reach out to us today to discover how our Business Law team can help you take proactive steps today to ensure your private securities offering remains fully compliant and protect your company’s future.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!