Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

SEC Takes Actions Against Issuers for Failure to File Form D

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: March 18, 2025

Key Contacts

Back
SEC Takes Actions Against Issuers for Failure to File Form D

In December, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced charges against two privately held companies for failing to file a Form D notice, which is generally utilized for exempt securities offerings. Here, the SEC’s enforcement sends a strong message: compliance with regulatory requirements is not optional and failure to comply can have significant consequences.

Understanding Form D and Regulation D Compliance

Securities offerings in the United States must either be registered under the Securities Act or qualify for a registration exemption. One of the most popular exemptions is Regulation D,  which provides a safe harbor from registration requirements.  To qualify for exemption under Regulation D, the issuer of unregistered securities must file a notice of sale via a Form D filing no later than 15 calendar days after the first sale in a private offering. This filing provides the SEC the essential information about the issuer and the offering to allow for the monitoring of the private securities offerings.   

While previously considered by many to be a technicality, these recent enforcement actions highlight that failure to comply with Rule 503 of Regulation D now carries real risk.   

A Shift in SEC Enforcement

For years, many issuers believed they could avoid SEC enforcement actions even though they did not comply with the filing of Form D and/or deviating from other Regulation D requirements. Previously issued guidance from the SEC’s Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations provided that while a Form D filing is a requirement of Rule 503, it is not a condition to the availability of an exemption pursuant to Rule 504 or 506 of Regulation D. This discrepancy gave rise to an informal understanding that the SEC would not initiate an enforcement action solely for the failure to file a Form D.  As a result, many issuers conducted private offerings without making the Form D filing or with some other purported “insignificant deviations” from the Regulation D requirements, as the issuers considered the possibility of a SEC enforcement action to be low to nonexistent.  However, the recent enforcement actions indicate a shift in the SEC’s approach.  Whether this approach continues with the new administration remains to be seen.   

The Cases Against Pipe Technologies and Underdog Sports Holdings

The SEC’s enforcement actions against Pipe Technologies Inc. and Underdog Sports Holdings, Inc. serve as cautionary tales for issuers:

  • Pipe Technologies Inc.: This financial technology company engaged in multiple unregistered securities offerings, solicited at least 140 prospective investors, and raised at least $250 million from over 100 investors—all without filing any Form D.
  • Underdog Sports Holdings, Inc.: This online fantasy sports platform similarly conducted unregistered securities offering and reached out to several hundred investors, raising tens of millions of dollars—again, without filing any Form D.

Both companies not only failed to file Form D, but they also engaged in general solicitation, further limiting their available exemptions under Regulation D. The SEC imposed sanctions, including cease-and-desist orders and civil penalties, all of which underscore the serious consequences of non-compliance.

The SEC justified its actions against these two issuers on the basis that timely Form D filings help maintain transparency in the private capital markets by providing the SEC with important information about private securities offerings and ensure investor protection.  

What This Means for Issuers

These actions by the SEC may also encourage state regulators to increase scrutiny and enforcement of their own blue sky laws, further raising the stakes for non-compliant issuers. If you are considering raising capital through private securities offerings, it is important that you consult with a securities attorney and take the necessary precautions:

  • Ensure full compliance with all Regulation D requirements, including timely Form D filings.
  • Avoid general solicitation unless you are certain your offering qualifies under Rule 506(c) or Rule 504.
  • Seek legal guidance from experienced securities counsel to navigate complex regulatory landscapes.

Don’t Risk Costly Consequences

Failing to file Form D might seem like a minor oversight, but as these SEC enforcement actions demonstrate, it can lead to serious repercussions. Reach out to us today to discover how our Business Law team can help you take proactive steps today to ensure your private  securities offering remains fully compliant and protect your company’s future.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
New York NDA Requirements for Businesses post image

New York NDA Requirements for Businesses

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "New York NDA Requirements for Businesses"
New Jersey Will Contest Grounds Explained post image

New Jersey Will Contest Grounds Explained

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]

Author: Marc J. Comer

Link to post with title - "New Jersey Will Contest Grounds Explained"
Legal Issues Before Bringing on Investors post image

Legal Issues Before Bringing on Investors

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Legal Issues Before Bringing on Investors"
SECURE 2.0 RMD Planning Strategies post image

SECURE 2.0 RMD Planning Strategies

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]

Author: Marc J. Comer

Link to post with title - "SECURE 2.0 RMD Planning Strategies"
Buying Commercial Property in New Jersey: Legal Guide for Small Businesses post image

Buying Commercial Property in New Jersey: Legal Guide for Small Businesses

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]

Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

Link to post with title - "Buying Commercial Property in New Jersey: Legal Guide for Small Businesses"
The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities post image

The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!