Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

SCOTUS Holds Highly Compensated Employees Must Be Paid on a Salary Basis

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: March 14, 2023

Key Contacts

Back

On February 22, 2023, the United States Supreme Court held that certain highly compensated employees are entitled to overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) if they are not paid on a salary basis.

In Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. et al. v. Hewitt, 598 U.S. __ (2023), an oil rig supervisor earning over $200,000.00 per year sued for overtime as he was not paid a weekly rate, but rather a daily rate. Helix argued that Hewitt was a highly compensated exempt executive employee.

By way of background, under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), employers are required to pay their employees a minimum wage and overtime pay for hours worked in excess of 40 hours per week unless the employee is exempt from these requirements.

Under the FLSA, an employee is considered a bona fide executive excluded from the FLSA’s protections if the employee meets three tests: (1) the salary basis test, which requires that the employee receive a predetermined and fixed salary that does not vary with the amount of time worked; (2) the “salary level” test, which requires the preset salary to exceed a specified amount; and (3) the job “duties” test, which considers whether the employee has responsibility for managing the enterprise, directing other employees, and hiring and firing other employees.

In the underlying litigation, the dispute centered around whether Hewitt met the requirements under the Department of Labor regulations for being paid on a salary basis. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit in federal district court in Texas, alleging he was misclassified as exempt and was therefore entitled to overtime. The district court disagreed with the plaintiff, holding that because he received at least $936 in any week that he performed work for his employer—i.e., more than the $455 per week required to meet the minimum requirement for the salary basis test—he was properly classified as exempt.

The plaintiff then appealed this ruling to the Fifth Circuit. The Fifth Circuit agreed with the plaintiff, reasoning that the salary basis test requires an employee to be paid the same amount of salary on a weekly basis or less frequently, irrespective of the days worked in the particular workweek. Because the plaintiff’s pay varied by the number of days he worked in a workweek, the Fifth Circuit concluded it did not meet the regulatory definition of a “salary” for purposes of the white-collar exemptions under the FLSA. The employer appealed the Fifth Circuit’s ruling to the United States Supreme Court. It was undisputed that Hewitt satisfied (2) and (3); at issue was whether he was paid on a salary basis.

In Justice Kagan’s majority opinion, the Supreme Court held:

  • (1) To qualify as an exempt highly compensated employee or an exempt executive employee, the salary basis requirement must be met;
  • (2) A traditional “salary basis” compensation structure as defined in 29 C.F.R. § 541.602(a) is met only when the worker is guaranteed the minimum required amount ($684.00) on a weekly basis; and
  • (3) Daily-rate employees can satisfy this salary basis test, but only if the requirements of § 541.604(b) are met. Specifically, the employee’s wages include a guaranteed minimum amount they receive “regardless of the number of…days or shifts worked, and a reasonable relationship exists between the guaranteed amount and the amount actually earned.”

Implications for Employers

The Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt decision provides important guidance for employers who have Highly Compensated Employees who are paid on a daily basis. To qualify for the Highly Compensated Employee exemption, these employees must now be paid at least $684 per week on a salary or fee basis, regardless of their daily pay rate.

Employers who do not comply with this requirement may face liability for unpaid overtime wages and other damages. On the other hand, Highly Compensated Employees who are paid on a daily basis and do not receive at least the minimum weekly salary amount on a salary or fee basis may be entitled to overtime pay.

In conclusion, the Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt decision clarifies the “salary basis” test for Highly Compensated Employees paid on a daily basis and emphasizes the importance of complying with FLSA requirements. Employers who have questions about how to classify their employees should consult with the employment law team at Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC to ensure compliance with the FLSA and other applicable wage and hour laws.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
When to Settle and When to Fight: A Litigator's Framework post image

When to Settle and When to Fight: A Litigator's Framework

Every lawsuit comes with a cost, and knowing when to settle a lawsuit is one of the most consequential decisions a business owner will face. Experienced litigators understand how to minimize cost and obtain certainty for their clients. For many business owners, the decision is viewed almost entirely through a financial lens: What will it cost […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "When to Settle and When to Fight: A Litigator's Framework"
A Whistleblower Just Filed a Complaint Against Your Company: Here's What to Do Now post image

A Whistleblower Just Filed a Complaint Against Your Company: Here's What to Do Now

Few situations create more uncertainty than learning that an employee has filed a whistleblower complaint. Questions arise immediately: Is the allegation legitimate? Should the employee be placed on leave? Do we need to notify our insurance carrier? Are we now prevented from disciplining the employee if there are unrelated ongoing work related issues? There is […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "A Whistleblower Just Filed a Complaint Against Your Company: Here's What to Do Now"
Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors: An Alternative to Bankruptcy for Distressed Businesses post image

Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors: An Alternative to Bankruptcy for Distressed Businesses

When a business reaches the point where it can no longer service its debts or otherwise resolve its liabilities, management is often faced with a difficult question: is a bankruptcy filing necessary or is there another way to perform an orderly liquidation or sale of the business assets? While Chapters 7 and 11 of the […]

Author: John D. Giampolo

Link to post with title - "Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors: An Alternative to Bankruptcy for Distressed Businesses"
Breaking Down New Jersey’s “Mansion” Tax: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know post image

Breaking Down New Jersey’s “Mansion” Tax: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know

For many years, the New Jersey Mansion Tax has been a significant consideration in high-value real estate transactions. Recent legislative changes, however, have substantially altered how the tax operates, including who is responsible for paying it and the amount owed in certain transactions. Whether you are purchasing, selling, or investing in New Jersey real estate, […]

Author: George McGowan

Link to post with title - "Breaking Down New Jersey’s “Mansion” Tax: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know"
Estate Planning for Digital Assets Under New Jersey Law post image

Estate Planning for Digital Assets Under New Jersey Law

As our personal and financial lives increasingly move online, estate planning must evolve to address a new category of property: digital assets. From email accounts and social media profiles to cryptocurrency and cloud-stored business records, these assets often carry both financial and sentimental value. Yet, without proper planning, they can become inaccessible—or even lost—upon incapacity […]

Author: Marc J. Comer

Link to post with title - "Estate Planning for Digital Assets Under New Jersey Law"
The Role of Representation and Warranty Insurance in M&A Transactions post image

The Role of Representation and Warranty Insurance in M&A Transactions

In today’s mergers and acquisitions market, representation and warranty (R&W) insurance has become a common feature of deal negotiations. Once used primarily in larger transactions, R&W insurance is now frequently incorporated into middle-market deals as buyers and sellers look for efficient ways to allocate risk and close deals. When structured properly, R&W insurance can help […]

Author: George McGowan

Link to post with title - "The Role of Representation and Warranty Insurance in M&A Transactions"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!