
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: May 3, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comThe city council of bankrupt San Bernardino announced it will resume making payments to the state pension fund – the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, or CalPERS – to the chagrin of the city’s bondholders.
Municipal lawmakers approved a new 14-month budget that will require it to prioritize some creditors over others. The council voted to continue making $1.2 million pension payments on a bi-weekly basis effective July 1. In doing so, however, the city’s budget leaves no room to make payments to the city’s bondholders.
San Bernardino is not the first city faced with the decision of whether to prioritize payments to state pensions or Wall Street bondholders, but its decision to favor the pension fund may have an impact on how other distressed cities manage their own financial troubles. CalPERS is currently San Bernardino’s largest creditor, and called the city’s decision to continue payments a “smart business decision,” Reuters reports.
While the city agreed to resume pension payments, it left a great deal of uncertainty in how it plans to tackle other areas of debt. In what Mayor Pat Morris coined as the city’s “survival budget,” the amounts allocated toward repaying debt may fluctuate or face adjustments as the city continues to seek out solutions and meet its debt obligations.
“This budget of ours that leads us through the next 15, 16 months continues to defer critical obligations that must be acknowledged and paid off,” Morris told the San Bernardino Sun.
San Bernardino filed for bankruptcy law protection under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code last August. Since that period, it has deferred tens of millions of dollars in debt, and its survival budget focuses primarily on contributing to its state pension fund and covering critical needs for its residents, including police and fire services.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!