
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: May 3, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comThe city council of bankrupt San Bernardino announced it will resume making payments to the state pension fund – the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, or CalPERS – to the chagrin of the city’s bondholders.
Municipal lawmakers approved a new 14-month budget that will require it to prioritize some creditors over others. The council voted to continue making $1.2 million pension payments on a bi-weekly basis effective July 1. In doing so, however, the city’s budget leaves no room to make payments to the city’s bondholders.
San Bernardino is not the first city faced with the decision of whether to prioritize payments to state pensions or Wall Street bondholders, but its decision to favor the pension fund may have an impact on how other distressed cities manage their own financial troubles. CalPERS is currently San Bernardino’s largest creditor, and called the city’s decision to continue payments a “smart business decision,” Reuters reports.
While the city agreed to resume pension payments, it left a great deal of uncertainty in how it plans to tackle other areas of debt. In what Mayor Pat Morris coined as the city’s “survival budget,” the amounts allocated toward repaying debt may fluctuate or face adjustments as the city continues to seek out solutions and meet its debt obligations.
“This budget of ours that leads us through the next 15, 16 months continues to defer critical obligations that must be acknowledged and paid off,” Morris told the San Bernardino Sun.
San Bernardino filed for bankruptcy law protection under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code last August. Since that period, it has deferred tens of millions of dollars in debt, and its survival budget focuses primarily on contributing to its state pension fund and covering critical needs for its residents, including police and fire services.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!