James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Rhode Island, Same Sex Divorce and Portability: Imperfect Together
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: August 13, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Rhode Island Governor Chafee issued an executive order directing the state to recognize same-sex marriages performed out-of-state. The executive order does not, however, permit same sex divorce. Society is in a state of limbo where executive orders can address some, but not all, of the issues.
How does one address the use of the Federal Estate Tax Exemption, currently $5,250,000, for same-sex couples in states that do not recognize same-sex marriage? If A and B marry in a state that permits same-sex marriages and then move to a state that does not recognize same-sex marriage, are they married for state death tax purposes? Typically, a couple must be married under state law before they are eligible for the marital deduction. Whether they are married is of critical importance for federal estate tax purposes where marital deduction, the $5,250,000 Exemption and the portability of the Deceased Spouse Unused Exclusion Amount (“DSUEA”) are the pillars of estate planning. Portability is where the surviving spouse adds the exemption of the first-to-die to his or her own. In states that have an estate tax that follows federal law, there may be new impediments that prevent consistency.
Consider the same-sex marriage of A and B where A dies and B survives. If the marriage of A and B is not recognized by the state of residence, what is the Deceased Spouse Unused Exclusion Amount (“DSUEA”)? Is B entitled to use A’s exemption or is it lost if not used?
Assume that B survives A and then remarries C. In theory, B should lose the DSUEA from A because B has remarried and the couple of A and C are therefore only entitled to the DSUEA of either A or C. This is the rule that applies to traditional couples.
If the state recognizes the same-sex marriage, then B should be entitled to have estate tax portability of A’s DSUEA. Suppose the state where A and B reside does not recognize their marriage. We could, conceivably, file a federal estate tax return on A’s death and elect portability. B, however, would not be able to elect portability on the state level, so B may be forced to use A’s exemption instead. Is it possible, where a state follows the federal estate tax rules, to file completely different returns because of this disconnect?
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Washington, D.C., Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
What Are FIRPTA Withholding Requirements?
If you purchase real property from a foreign person or entity, you may be required to withhold taxes from your payment to the seller under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA). The federal tax law is designed to ensure that foreign sellers pay any applicable capital gains tax on profits realized from […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Rhode Island, Same Sex Divorce and Portability: Imperfect Together
Author: James F. McDonough
Rhode Island Governor Chafee issued an executive order directing the state to recognize same-sex marriages performed out-of-state. The executive order does not, however, permit same sex divorce. Society is in a state of limbo where executive orders can address some, but not all, of the issues.
How does one address the use of the Federal Estate Tax Exemption, currently $5,250,000, for same-sex couples in states that do not recognize same-sex marriage? If A and B marry in a state that permits same-sex marriages and then move to a state that does not recognize same-sex marriage, are they married for state death tax purposes? Typically, a couple must be married under state law before they are eligible for the marital deduction. Whether they are married is of critical importance for federal estate tax purposes where marital deduction, the $5,250,000 Exemption and the portability of the Deceased Spouse Unused Exclusion Amount (“DSUEA”) are the pillars of estate planning. Portability is where the surviving spouse adds the exemption of the first-to-die to his or her own. In states that have an estate tax that follows federal law, there may be new impediments that prevent consistency.
Consider the same-sex marriage of A and B where A dies and B survives. If the marriage of A and B is not recognized by the state of residence, what is the Deceased Spouse Unused Exclusion Amount (“DSUEA”)? Is B entitled to use A’s exemption or is it lost if not used?
Assume that B survives A and then remarries C. In theory, B should lose the DSUEA from A because B has remarried and the couple of A and C are therefore only entitled to the DSUEA of either A or C. This is the rule that applies to traditional couples.
If the state recognizes the same-sex marriage, then B should be entitled to have estate tax portability of A’s DSUEA. Suppose the state where A and B reside does not recognize their marriage. We could, conceivably, file a federal estate tax return on A’s death and elect portability. B, however, would not be able to elect portability on the state level, so B may be forced to use A’s exemption instead. Is it possible, where a state follows the federal estate tax rules, to file completely different returns because of this disconnect?