
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: May 19, 2015

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comThe trustee assigned to RadioShack’s bankruptcy recently implored a federal court to protect customer privacy by ensuring that the electronics retailer cannot sell its customer data amid its plans to wind down and keep certain stores operational.
Andrew Vara, the acting trustee, is certainly not alone in his objections, as the Attorneys General of several states have questioned whether RadioShack even has the right to sell the aforementioned information without violating its own privacy policies.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has repeatedly spoken out against the electronics retailer selling this data, originally filing an objection to this sale in March, according to Law360. When filing this objection, he argued that allowing the company to sell this wealth of information – which includes data on close to 40 percent of the U.S. population – would violate the consumer protection laws of several states and breach RadioShack’s privacy policies.
On April 16, Paxton once again implored the federal judge handling the case to deny the company’s request to sell its consumer data, reiterating that Texas – along with 35 other states – has warned that allowing such a transaction would breach costumer privacy rights, Law360 reported. In addition, he stated that the electronics retailer has failed to shed light on exactly which personal information would be included in the sale.
Because RadioShack has not specified key matters, including the number of consumers whose data would be involved in the sale, Vara said that court-appointed privacy ombudsman Elise Frejka has been unable to perform her duties, and the federal court has not been able to consider alternatives that help reduce consumer privacy losses if the sale does indeed finalize, according to Law360.
While any such transaction could involve selling the information of as many as 117 million customers, RadioShack previously estimated only 67 million of these files have any value, the media outlet reported. Paxton has sought additional clarity, requesting April 16 that the court order RadioShack to specify the exact information it wants to sell, how many customers such a move would affect and whether the data came from in-store or online purchases.
In addition, Paxton’s office has argued that RadioShack should not be allowed to link its consumer data to other assets it wants to sell, stating that doing so would make the value of the information ambiguous, according to the news source.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!