
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: May 19, 2015
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comThe trustee assigned to RadioShack’s bankruptcy recently implored a federal court to protect customer privacy by ensuring that the electronics retailer cannot sell its customer data amid its plans to wind down and keep certain stores operational.
Andrew Vara, the acting trustee, is certainly not alone in his objections, as the Attorneys General of several states have questioned whether RadioShack even has the right to sell the aforementioned information without violating its own privacy policies.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has repeatedly spoken out against the electronics retailer selling this data, originally filing an objection to this sale in March, according to Law360. When filing this objection, he argued that allowing the company to sell this wealth of information – which includes data on close to 40 percent of the U.S. population – would violate the consumer protection laws of several states and breach RadioShack’s privacy policies.
On April 16, Paxton once again implored the federal judge handling the case to deny the company’s request to sell its consumer data, reiterating that Texas – along with 35 other states – has warned that allowing such a transaction would breach costumer privacy rights, Law360 reported. In addition, he stated that the electronics retailer has failed to shed light on exactly which personal information would be included in the sale.
Because RadioShack has not specified key matters, including the number of consumers whose data would be involved in the sale, Vara said that court-appointed privacy ombudsman Elise Frejka has been unable to perform her duties, and the federal court has not been able to consider alternatives that help reduce consumer privacy losses if the sale does indeed finalize, according to Law360.
While any such transaction could involve selling the information of as many as 117 million customers, RadioShack previously estimated only 67 million of these files have any value, the media outlet reported. Paxton has sought additional clarity, requesting April 16 that the court order RadioShack to specify the exact information it wants to sell, how many customers such a move would affect and whether the data came from in-store or online purchases.
In addition, Paxton’s office has argued that RadioShack should not be allowed to link its consumer data to other assets it wants to sell, stating that doing so would make the value of the information ambiguous, according to the news source.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!