James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Possible Pfizer inversion raises questions among lawmakers
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: May 16, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
U.S.-based pharmaceutical company Pfizer has offered to buy British competitor AstraZeneca for $99 billion, according to The New York Times. In buying the company and moving its headquarters to Britain, Pfizer could avoid U.S. corporate tax liability on its income outside of the the country. Currently, the company pays an effective tax rate of approximately 27 percent – much higher than the British corporate income tax rate of 21 percent.
There are at least 50 American companies that have undergone the controversial inversion process, in which a U.S. company merges with a smaller foreign company in order to enjoy lower tax rates, almost half of which have occurred in the last two years, according to the news source. If successful, however, Pfizer would be the largest and best-known company to do so.
“Pfizer is the Coca-Cola of health care. It’s as American as apple pie,” Mark Schoenebaum, an analyst with the ISI Group, told the news source. “If there is a deal that is going to start a real dialogue in Washington, it might be a company like this.”
Such a move would result in the loss of tax income from the company for the U.S. government, which amounted to about $2.87 billion last year, Reuters reported. This has sparked serious concern from American lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.
“This further demonstrates the urgency for tax reform,” a spokeswoman for Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden, chairman of the tax-writing U.S. Senate Finance Committee, told the news source. “Now is the time to undertake comprehensive reform to ensure our country stays competitive on a global stage and continues to be the best place for corporate investment.”
The Obama administration included a proposal in its 2015 budget to more seriously regulate deals like the one that Pfizer is attempting, according to Reuters. With Congress deadlocked on tax issues, however, the proposal is unlikely to gain any real ground.
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know
Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split
Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs
When a family member can no longer make important decisions for themself, the question is often not whether the family will step in, but whether they have the legal authority to do so. A spouse may manage household finances, or an adult child may arrange medical care and pay bills. Still, informal assistance does not […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments
New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga
“No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy
A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
Utility-Scale Battery Storage Projects: A Legal Roadmap for Developers, Property Owners and Other Stakeholders
Utility-scale battery energy storage systems (BESS) are becoming an increasingly important component of the electric grid throughout New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. As renewable generation expands, electricity demand increases and grid operators seek greater flexibility, battery storage can help balance supply and demand while providing additional capacity and reliability. For developers, battery storage presents […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.