Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Ponzi Scheme Victims Receive 4 Cents on the Dollar from Lou Pearlman Following His Bankruptcy
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: July 9, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Lou Pearlman may be known by many as the creator of teen sensation boy bands ‘N Sync and the Backstreet Boys, but to thousands of mom-and-pop investors, he will forever be known as the Ponzi schemer who scammed them out of millions. What’s worse, bankruptcy trustee Soneet Kapila recently made public that, following a liquidation settlement of the former producer’s assets, Ponzi scheme victims will receive an initial payout of no more than 4 cents on the dollar.
Pearlman is currently serving a 25-year prison sentence for devising a Ponzi scheme that cheated investors out of more than $300 million. Since Pearlman’s conviction and his petition for bankruptcy law protection in 2007, Kapila has recovered roughly $35 million from asset sales, royalty payments, and lawsuit settlements. However, the bulk of this amount will be extended to secured creditors. According to the settlement plan Kapila filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Orlando, roughly $25 million of the recovered amount will go toward secured creditors and to cover attorney’s fees.
The remaining $10 million will be divided among unsecured creditors – who lost roughly $260 million. This could amount to a payout of roughly $4,000 for a $100,000 loss, the Tampa Bay Times reports. A committee of unsecured creditors is urging the victims to accept the terms, stressing that fighting the plan could result in further delays in the six-year-long struggle. Kapila also defended the settlement, arguing that, were it not for the banks’ choosing to waive tens of millions of dollars in claims, and the IRS accepting a reduced amount, the victims might have walked away with nothing.
“It’s been a case where myself [sic] and my professional team has [sic] been willing to hang in there and take a lot of risk on fees (being reimbursed at all) because there was no money to pay anyone,” Kapila told the Times. “This case required quantum effort.”
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Tariff Response Options for Small Businesses Facing Financial Distress
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.