Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Ponzi Scheme Victims Receive 4 Cents on the Dollar from Lou Pearlman Following His Bankruptcy
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: July 9, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Lou Pearlman may be known by many as the creator of teen sensation boy bands ‘N Sync and the Backstreet Boys, but to thousands of mom-and-pop investors, he will forever be known as the Ponzi schemer who scammed them out of millions. What’s worse, bankruptcy trustee Soneet Kapila recently made public that, following a liquidation settlement of the former producer’s assets, Ponzi scheme victims will receive an initial payout of no more than 4 cents on the dollar.
Pearlman is currently serving a 25-year prison sentence for devising a Ponzi scheme that cheated investors out of more than $300 million. Since Pearlman’s conviction and his petition for bankruptcy law protection in 2007, Kapila has recovered roughly $35 million from asset sales, royalty payments, and lawsuit settlements. However, the bulk of this amount will be extended to secured creditors. According to the settlement plan Kapila filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Orlando, roughly $25 million of the recovered amount will go toward secured creditors and to cover attorney’s fees.
The remaining $10 million will be divided among unsecured creditors – who lost roughly $260 million. This could amount to a payout of roughly $4,000 for a $100,000 loss, the Tampa Bay Times reports. A committee of unsecured creditors is urging the victims to accept the terms, stressing that fighting the plan could result in further delays in the six-year-long struggle. Kapila also defended the settlement, arguing that, were it not for the banks’ choosing to waive tens of millions of dollars in claims, and the IRS accepting a reduced amount, the victims might have walked away with nothing.
“It’s been a case where myself [sic] and my professional team has [sic] been willing to hang in there and take a lot of risk on fees (being reimbursed at all) because there was no money to pay anyone,” Kapila told the Times. “This case required quantum effort.”
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know
Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split
Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs
When a family member can no longer make important decisions for themself, the question is often not whether the family will step in, but whether they have the legal authority to do so. A spouse may manage household finances, or an adult child may arrange medical care and pay bills. Still, informal assistance does not […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments
New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga
“No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy
A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
Utility-Scale Battery Storage Projects: A Legal Roadmap for Developers, Property Owners and Other Stakeholders
Utility-scale battery energy storage systems (BESS) are becoming an increasingly important component of the electric grid throughout New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. As renewable generation expands, electricity demand increases and grid operators seek greater flexibility, battery storage can help balance supply and demand while providing additional capacity and reliability. For developers, battery storage presents […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.