James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
What to Know About Paying Estate Taxes Over Time
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: October 24, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
An estate may, in certain circumstances, elect to pay estate tax in a series of payments over a number of years.
This election is available to estates in which assets are used in an active trade or business comprise more than thirty-five percent (35%) of the estate. Payment of estate tax can be extended over a ten-year term with the first payment delayed for five (5) years. This election enables small businesses to continue after the death of the owner.
What can go wrong?
In (Estate of) Johnson v. U.S., the estate deferred payment of estate tax over ten years. A hotel comprised $11.5m of value in an estate of $16m. The estate paid installments for the proportion of estate tax attributable to the hotel in the years 1996 to 2006 and represents. Estate tax on non-business assets such as a residence, stocks and bonds, is not deferred
In 2002, the hotel went bankrupt after the estate paid $5.0m of the deferred tax, leaving about $1.8m outstanding. The estate defaulted on the payment plan and the government filed suit on the grounds of transferee liability §6324(a).
In Johnson, a revocable living trust held four partnerships, one for each child. The trustees distributed the partnerships, not the estate. Transferee liability is based upon receiving property, on or after date of death, that was included in the gross estate. The beneficiaries claimed they weren’t transferees because they did not receive the property from the decedent’s estate. The trustees admitted they were transferees but claimed the action was time barred. The trustees also claimed that they were not liable for the tax because the estate had enough money at the time of death.
The court held the deferral agreement tolled the statute of limitations and the government could pursue the trustees and the beneficiaries as transferees.
One of the many issues in the deferral of estate tax liability is the obligations of the fiduciaries and beneficiaries to one another. In Estate v. Turco, the court-appointed administrator sought to recover proceeds of life insurance payable to trusts and use those proceeds to pay tax that was deferred. In Turco, the decline in real estate values was also the cause of the inability to pay.
The Johnson and Turco cases demonstrate what can go wrong.
Clearly, business conditions can impact the ability to pay and upset expectations of the parties. What if the business is left to one beneficiary and other assets (stocks, insurance, IRAs) are left to other beneficiaries? There is a bit of dilemma in planning the estate plan. Do you leave the business to the beneficiary with the aptitude for it but subject the other beneficiaries to the economic risks? Look at Turco and Johnson, the crash in the real estate market prevented repayment of deferred estate tax. On the other hand, is there enough in the way of liquid assets to pay the estate tax. Where does that leave the other beneficiaries, in terms of an inheritance, if the liquid assets pay the taxes.
The hard work is not making the election. Instead, it lies behind the scenes in dealing with the potential issues.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
What to Know About Paying Estate Taxes Over Time
Author: James F. McDonough
An estate may, in certain circumstances, elect to pay estate tax in a series of payments over a number of years.
This election is available to estates in which assets are used in an active trade or business comprise more than thirty-five percent (35%) of the estate. Payment of estate tax can be extended over a ten-year term with the first payment delayed for five (5) years. This election enables small businesses to continue after the death of the owner.
What can go wrong?
In (Estate of) Johnson v. U.S., the estate deferred payment of estate tax over ten years. A hotel comprised $11.5m of value in an estate of $16m. The estate paid installments for the proportion of estate tax attributable to the hotel in the years 1996 to 2006 and represents. Estate tax on non-business assets such as a residence, stocks and bonds, is not deferred
In 2002, the hotel went bankrupt after the estate paid $5.0m of the deferred tax, leaving about $1.8m outstanding. The estate defaulted on the payment plan and the government filed suit on the grounds of transferee liability §6324(a).
In Johnson, a revocable living trust held four partnerships, one for each child. The trustees distributed the partnerships, not the estate. Transferee liability is based upon receiving property, on or after date of death, that was included in the gross estate. The beneficiaries claimed they weren’t transferees because they did not receive the property from the decedent’s estate. The trustees admitted they were transferees but claimed the action was time barred. The trustees also claimed that they were not liable for the tax because the estate had enough money at the time of death.
The court held the deferral agreement tolled the statute of limitations and the government could pursue the trustees and the beneficiaries as transferees.
One of the many issues in the deferral of estate tax liability is the obligations of the fiduciaries and beneficiaries to one another. In Estate v. Turco, the court-appointed administrator sought to recover proceeds of life insurance payable to trusts and use those proceeds to pay tax that was deferred. In Turco, the decline in real estate values was also the cause of the inability to pay.
The Johnson and Turco cases demonstrate what can go wrong.
Clearly, business conditions can impact the ability to pay and upset expectations of the parties. What if the business is left to one beneficiary and other assets (stocks, insurance, IRAs) are left to other beneficiaries? There is a bit of dilemma in planning the estate plan. Do you leave the business to the beneficiary with the aptitude for it but subject the other beneficiaries to the economic risks? Look at Turco and Johnson, the crash in the real estate market prevented repayment of deferred estate tax. On the other hand, is there enough in the way of liquid assets to pay the estate tax. Where does that leave the other beneficiaries, in terms of an inheritance, if the liquid assets pay the taxes.
The hard work is not making the election. Instead, it lies behind the scenes in dealing with the potential issues.