
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: October 6, 2015

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comOptim Energy LLC announced on Aug. 13 that the company had agreed to pay Walnut Creek Mining, the energy branch of private equity giant Blackstone Group, $5 million to settle their legal battle. According to a Wall Street Journal report, the Blackstone Group will reportedly drop its $190 million appeal of Optim’s court-approved restructuring plan as part of the new agreement.
Optim, a power plant operator, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on Feb. 12, 2014 due to a collapse in electricity prices. The resulting 40 percent drop in prices hindered Optim’s ability to fulfill its debt repayments to Blackstone and various primary and lower-ranking creditors. Optim’s debt accumulated after it received a loan from Blackstone for the construction of a power plant and the acquisition of a facility in Texas.
Walnut Creek Mining claimed that Optim’s restructuring plan was inadequate because the firm only stood to recover one percent of the debt total. Blackstone had been pursuing a $190 million claim against Optim for rejection damages from a fuel supply agreement in the previously approved plan.
One of the main issues presented in Blackstone’s appeal was that after the firm bid $126 million to acquire an Optim power plant, a price that doubled all other offers, Optim expected the firm to bid on its two other plants. However, Optim claimed that Blackstone was using Walnut Creek Mining, which supplied fuel to Optim’s power plants, to undermine its operations as a way to drive down the company’s bidding price for the plants at the bankruptcy auction.
In court documents, the new plan will allow Optim to avoid making repayments on the full $713 million debt total to secured creditors. Optim officials claimed that this agreement will halt litigation with Blackstone, according to the Wall Street Journal. In turn, the deal will also stop litigation with unsecured creditors as the company agreed to distribute a portion of the power plant sales proceeds to these lower-ranking creditors. Further, unsecured creditors will now recover 95 cents on the dollar as opposed to 75 cents, as stated in the previous bankruptcy plan.
Blackstone officials stated in court papers that the appeal will not be officially dropped until the liquidation plan for Optim’s six other bankrupt entities is approved by the court.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

When a family member can no longer make important decisions for themself, the question is often not whether the family will step in, but whether they have the legal authority to do so. A spouse may manage household finances, or an adult child may arrange medical care and pay bills. Still, informal assistance does not […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!