
Robert E. Levy
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Robert E. Levy
Date: March 30, 2015

Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comHowever, many companies are learning that online job applications can lead to unforeseen liability, particularly when it comes to employee background checks. Dollar General Corp., Publix Super Markets Inc., and Whole Foods Market, Inc. are just a few large retailers that have been targeted by class-action lawsuits alleging violations of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
The FCRA imposes several requirements on employers who wish to conduct background checks on job applicants, such as obtaining credit reports and criminal records. Most notably, employers must notify applicants that they might use information in their consumer report for decisions related to their employment and obtain written authorization to obtain the reports. This written disclosure must be in a stand-alone format separate from the job application and not contain any other content, although it may be contained with the authorization.
The FCRA has consistently been a litigation trap for unwary businesses. However, the Internet has made compliance even more difficult. Michaels Stores, Inc. is currently facing multiple lawsuits overs its use a click-wrap agreement in its online job application. Rather than assent to a separate FCPA disclosure, applicants clicked “I Agree” at the end of the application.
In one suit, the plaintiff contends that the online job application contained so much information that it did not adequately notify applicants that the company would obtain a credit report. The complaint states: “Defendant’s FCRA disclosure and authorization are embedded within an online employment application which appears as one long continuous Web page that applicants fill out, and which contains a liability release, among reams of other extraneous information.”
In another suit, which is pending in New Jersey, the plaintiff alleges that Michaels Stores “neglected to properly inform job applicants that the company regularly performed background checks on potential employees during the application process” in violation of the FCRA and the New Jersey Fair Credit Reporting Act (NJFCRA). The suit seeks damages of up to $1000 for each FCRA and NJFCRA violation.
Last year, Dollar General Corp. and Publix Super Markets Inc. agreed to pay almost $11 million to resolve similar class-action suits. Given the potential for liability (even in the absence of any harm to job applicants), businesses may want to review their online job applications and consult with an experienced business attorney regarding any necessary changes that may be needed to comply with the FCRA.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!