
Robert E. Levy
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Robert E. Levy
Date: March 30, 2015

Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comHowever, many companies are learning that online job applications can lead to unforeseen liability, particularly when it comes to employee background checks. Dollar General Corp., Publix Super Markets Inc., and Whole Foods Market, Inc. are just a few large retailers that have been targeted by class-action lawsuits alleging violations of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
The FCRA imposes several requirements on employers who wish to conduct background checks on job applicants, such as obtaining credit reports and criminal records. Most notably, employers must notify applicants that they might use information in their consumer report for decisions related to their employment and obtain written authorization to obtain the reports. This written disclosure must be in a stand-alone format separate from the job application and not contain any other content, although it may be contained with the authorization.
The FCRA has consistently been a litigation trap for unwary businesses. However, the Internet has made compliance even more difficult. Michaels Stores, Inc. is currently facing multiple lawsuits overs its use a click-wrap agreement in its online job application. Rather than assent to a separate FCPA disclosure, applicants clicked “I Agree” at the end of the application.
In one suit, the plaintiff contends that the online job application contained so much information that it did not adequately notify applicants that the company would obtain a credit report. The complaint states: “Defendant’s FCRA disclosure and authorization are embedded within an online employment application which appears as one long continuous Web page that applicants fill out, and which contains a liability release, among reams of other extraneous information.”
In another suit, which is pending in New Jersey, the plaintiff alleges that Michaels Stores “neglected to properly inform job applicants that the company regularly performed background checks on potential employees during the application process” in violation of the FCRA and the New Jersey Fair Credit Reporting Act (NJFCRA). The suit seeks damages of up to $1000 for each FCRA and NJFCRA violation.
Last year, Dollar General Corp. and Publix Super Markets Inc. agreed to pay almost $11 million to resolve similar class-action suits. Given the potential for liability (even in the absence of any harm to job applicants), businesses may want to review their online job applications and consult with an experienced business attorney regarding any necessary changes that may be needed to comply with the FCRA.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!