
Robert E. Levy
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Robert E. Levy
Date: March 30, 2015

Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comHowever, many companies are learning that online job applications can lead to unforeseen liability, particularly when it comes to employee background checks. Dollar General Corp., Publix Super Markets Inc., and Whole Foods Market, Inc. are just a few large retailers that have been targeted by class-action lawsuits alleging violations of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
The FCRA imposes several requirements on employers who wish to conduct background checks on job applicants, such as obtaining credit reports and criminal records. Most notably, employers must notify applicants that they might use information in their consumer report for decisions related to their employment and obtain written authorization to obtain the reports. This written disclosure must be in a stand-alone format separate from the job application and not contain any other content, although it may be contained with the authorization.
The FCRA has consistently been a litigation trap for unwary businesses. However, the Internet has made compliance even more difficult. Michaels Stores, Inc. is currently facing multiple lawsuits overs its use a click-wrap agreement in its online job application. Rather than assent to a separate FCPA disclosure, applicants clicked “I Agree” at the end of the application.
In one suit, the plaintiff contends that the online job application contained so much information that it did not adequately notify applicants that the company would obtain a credit report. The complaint states: “Defendant’s FCRA disclosure and authorization are embedded within an online employment application which appears as one long continuous Web page that applicants fill out, and which contains a liability release, among reams of other extraneous information.”
In another suit, which is pending in New Jersey, the plaintiff alleges that Michaels Stores “neglected to properly inform job applicants that the company regularly performed background checks on potential employees during the application process” in violation of the FCRA and the New Jersey Fair Credit Reporting Act (NJFCRA). The suit seeks damages of up to $1000 for each FCRA and NJFCRA violation.
Last year, Dollar General Corp. and Publix Super Markets Inc. agreed to pay almost $11 million to resolve similar class-action suits. Given the potential for liability (even in the absence of any harm to job applicants), businesses may want to review their online job applications and consult with an experienced business attorney regarding any necessary changes that may be needed to comply with the FCRA.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!