Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 27, 2017
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comWhile many of President Donald Trump’s executive orders have made headlines, one of the less controversial policy changes may have the most significant impact on New York and New Jersey businesses. Under the executive order, entitled “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs,” executive agencies must eliminate two existing regulations for each new rule issued.
The executive order aims to cut regulatory burdens and costs. As stated by President Trump, “it is essential to manage the costs associated with the governmental imposition of private expenditures required to comply with Federal regulations.”
Toward that end, the so-called “two for one” mandate specifically states: “Unless prohibited by law, whenever an executive department or agency publicly proposes for notice and comment or otherwise promulgates a new regulation, it shall identify at least two existing regulations to be repealed.” The executive order further provides that any new incremental costs associated with new regulations must, to the extent permitted by law, be offset by the elimination of existing costs associated with at least two prior regulations.
The executive order also imposes a “cap” on new regulations for Fiscal Year 2017, which has already begun. It states that the “heads of all agencies are directed that the total incremental cost of all new regulations, including repealed regulations, to be finalized this year shall be no greater than zero.” The only exceptions are rules that are otherwise required by law and rules that are authorized in writing by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
The executive order represents one of the most significant regulatory policy changes in several decades. In numerous studies, businesses cite increasing regulatory burdens as a top concern. So, if the end result is a leaner and more streamlined regulatory environment, the executive order is certainly good news. However, the devil is in the details.
To start, the mandate does not impact independent regulatory agencies over which the President does not have direct control. That leaves key agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) outside the purview of the order.
Since the executive order is drafted broadly, it is unclear how it will be applied in practice. For agencies like the Department of Labor, the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office that are looking to make policy changes under the Trump Administration or seeking to overhaul complex regulatory regimes, the order could actually lead to headaches for everyone involved. Any regulatory changes must still comply with Administrative Procedure Act’s requirement for public notice and comment. In addition, the wholesale elimination of regulations creates a serious litigation risk.
Do you have any questions regarding the “One In, Two Out” rule and its potential impact on your business? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Michael Jimenez, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
While many of President Donald Trump’s executive orders have made headlines, one of the less controversial policy changes may have the most significant impact on New York and New Jersey businesses. Under the executive order, entitled “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs,” executive agencies must eliminate two existing regulations for each new rule issued.
The executive order aims to cut regulatory burdens and costs. As stated by President Trump, “it is essential to manage the costs associated with the governmental imposition of private expenditures required to comply with Federal regulations.”
Toward that end, the so-called “two for one” mandate specifically states: “Unless prohibited by law, whenever an executive department or agency publicly proposes for notice and comment or otherwise promulgates a new regulation, it shall identify at least two existing regulations to be repealed.” The executive order further provides that any new incremental costs associated with new regulations must, to the extent permitted by law, be offset by the elimination of existing costs associated with at least two prior regulations.
The executive order also imposes a “cap” on new regulations for Fiscal Year 2017, which has already begun. It states that the “heads of all agencies are directed that the total incremental cost of all new regulations, including repealed regulations, to be finalized this year shall be no greater than zero.” The only exceptions are rules that are otherwise required by law and rules that are authorized in writing by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
The executive order represents one of the most significant regulatory policy changes in several decades. In numerous studies, businesses cite increasing regulatory burdens as a top concern. So, if the end result is a leaner and more streamlined regulatory environment, the executive order is certainly good news. However, the devil is in the details.
To start, the mandate does not impact independent regulatory agencies over which the President does not have direct control. That leaves key agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) outside the purview of the order.
Since the executive order is drafted broadly, it is unclear how it will be applied in practice. For agencies like the Department of Labor, the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office that are looking to make policy changes under the Trump Administration or seeking to overhaul complex regulatory regimes, the order could actually lead to headaches for everyone involved. Any regulatory changes must still comply with Administrative Procedure Act’s requirement for public notice and comment. In addition, the wholesale elimination of regulations creates a serious litigation risk.
Do you have any questions regarding the “One In, Two Out” rule and its potential impact on your business? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Michael Jimenez, at 201-806-3364.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!