Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: July 1, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comNow, the ICIJ has released a new report, which gives the public access to extensive offshore tax haven records through its new Offshore Leaks Database.

The system contains hundreds of thousands of records detailing corporations, rather than individuals, that hold sizable assets in popular tax-havens. The consortium gained this information from roughly 2.5 million emails and financial documents it received in 2012, according to the Huffington Post. While lawmakers and the IRS will have ultimate say over whether any of the data in the documents constitute potential tax law violations, the release of the documents may increase the already-intense scrutiny of corporations and their use of certain tax practices to limit their liability.
This is particularly true after a 2012 report from the Tax Justice Network found that untaxed wealth invested in offshore tax havens ranged from $28 to $32 trillion, an amount that is equal to two years’ worth of U.S. economic output.
Several corporations, including Apple, Starbucks, Disney, and Microsoft have made headlines as of late due to lawmakers’ questioning over their taxes, and some – including Starbucks and Disney – have lobbied for more flexibility over their use of certain benefits and deductions. While scrutiny of many big-name firms continues, some analysts predict that new international agreements between several countries and the U.S. may provide more insight and transparency in corporate tax practices, which could potentially lead to more legal challenges of certain tax safeguards. Already, the Group of Eight (G-8) has named tax evasion and tax avoidance a key talking point at this year’s summit, indicating that a heavier emphasis on tax compliance is soon to become a global issue.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!