Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: July 23, 2021
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
The New York Division of Financial Services (NYDFS or Department) recently issued guidance on what steps financial institutions should be taking to reduce the risk of a ransomware attack. The new guidelines come as the number of ransomware attacks increased 300 percent in 2020.
Ransomware attacks are among the most disruptive cyberattacks. They have also become increasingly prevalent and more sophisticated in recent years. Cybercriminals’ success in obtaining large extortion payments has also financed the development of more effective hacking and ransomware tools and helped recruit additional hackers. Accordingly, NYDFS shares the FBI’s view that companies should avoid making ransomware payments if their networks are compromised. Instead, the Department is calling on businesses to dedicate their resources to thwarting attacks.
“As ransomware attacks continue to surge, implementing cybersecurity measures is critical to protect consumers and business lines,” Superintendent Linda Lacewell said in a press statement. “As reported, cybercriminals are not only extorting individual companies but also jeopardizing the stability of the financial services industry. We must all do our part to prevent ransomware incidents.”
In its ransomware guidance, NYDFS warns that a major ransomware attack could cause the next great financial crisis. “A ransomware attack that simultaneously cripples several financial services companies could lead to a loss of confidence in the financial system,” the guidance states. “This could happen either through an exploitation of a vulnerability in widely used software to attack many companies at once – as seen recently for SolarWinds and Microsoft Exchange – or through a single ransomware attack that disables critical infrastructure for financial services, such as a cloud services provider or a regional power grid.”
NYDFS also notes that the cost of ransomware has also impacted the cyber insurance market. Because of ransomware, loss ratios on cyber insurance increased from an average of 42% during 2015-2019 to 73% in 2020, according to the Department.
NYDFS has investigated reports of ransomware attacks made to the agency and determined that the perpetrators are repeatedly using the same handful of techniques. In most cases, hackers enter a victim’s network, obtain administrator privileges once inside, and then use those elevated privileges to deploy ransomware, avoid security controls, steal data, and disable backups.
NYDFS has also confirmed that most attacks are preventable. “Each step in this playbook has known cybersecurity countermeasures, which if implemented effectively will substantially reduce the risk of a successful ransomware attack,” the Department states.
Below are several of NYDFS’s recommended security controls:
NYDFS further advises that given that ransomware attacks inherently pose significant risks to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of an organization’s data, regulated companies should assume that any successful deployment of ransomware on their internal network should be reported to DFS “as promptly as possible and within 72 hours at the latest,” pursuant to 23 NYCRR § 500.17(a). Similarly, any intrusion where hackers gain access to privileged accounts generally must also be reported. According to the Department, it is considering clarifying its reporting requirements by expressly requiring these types of incidents to be reported.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Thomas Herndon, Jr., or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!