Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 23, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comErnst & Young and PriceWaterhouseCoopers will not be dismissed from the securities class-action lawsuit involving Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. (OSG). The two firms provided auditing services to the now defunct company.
The case revolves around OSG’s public offering of three hundred million dollars of unsecured notes. In connection with the transaction, OSG filed a Shelf Registration Statement and Prospectus that allegedly failed to disclose tax liability under Section 956 of Section F of the Internal Revenue Code.
Both Ernst & Young and PriceWaterhouseCoopers signed the Registration Statement. They also “expressly consented to having their unqualified audit opinions for OSG’s financial statements [for years 2007 through 2009] incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement.” OSG later filed for bankruptcy, which included an Internal Revenue Service claim of $35 million in unpaid corporate taxes.
Under Section 11 of the Securities Act, purchasers of registered securities are afforded strict liability protection where “any part of the registration statement, when such part became effective, contained an untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading.” Experts like accountants may specifically be held liable if they certified any part of the Registration Statement containing actionably false information or “prepared any report or valuation used in connection with the registration statement.”
However, with regard to “matters of belief and opinion,” Section 11 liability applies only where the statement was “both objectively false and disbelieved by the defendant at the time it was expressed” under the recent precedent established in Fait v. Regions Financial Corp. In the current case, Ernst & Young and PriceWaterhouseCoopers argued that Fait’s subjective disbelief standard should apply to their auditing “opinions.” However, the court disagreed.
As explained in Judge Shira Scheindlin’s opinion, “Although the Internal Revenue Code is complex and often gives rise to debate, it cannot be said that statements of income tax liability are ‘subjective valuations.’ There is in fact an objective measure of income tax liability, as evidenced by OSG’s public declaration that its financial statements should ‘no longer be relied upon,’ as well as the IRS’s Proof of Claim in OSG’s bankruptcy proceedings.”
Judge Scheindlin further rejected the auditors’ assertion that the entire Audit Opinion is a statement of belief or opinion under Fait because it contains the word “opinion” in its title, and prefaces its conclusions with the phrase “in our opinion.”
“[I]t would render Section 11 meaningless to find that an accountant’s liability turns on this semantic choice. Auditors may not shield themselves from liability under Section 11 merely by using the word ‘opinion’ as a disclaimer. Plaintiffs are only required to allege subjective disbelief where the statements concern ‘inherently subjective’ matters rather than ‘matters of objective fact,’” she concluded.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Michael Cifelli, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
Business partnerships, much like marriages, function exceptionally well when partners are aligned but can become challenging when disagreements arise. Partnership disputes often stem from conflicts over business strategy, financial management, and unclear role definitions among partners. Understanding Business Partnership Conflicts Partnership conflicts place significant stress on businesses, making proactive measures essential. Partnerships should establish detailed […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
*** The original article was featured on Bloomberg Tax, April 28, 2025 — As a tax attorney who spends much of my time helping people and companies who have large, unresolved issues with the IRS or one or more state tax departments, it often occurs to me that the best service that I can provide […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!