
Donald M. Pepe
Partner
732-568-8370 dpepe@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Donald M. Pepe
Date: October 12, 2015

Partner
732-568-8370 dpepe@sh-law.com
The latest changes reflect a new, comprehensive housing policy objective that seeks to distribute more evenly the benefits of the unprecedented wave of development now taking place in parts of the city.
Shortly after taking office in 2013, Mayor Fulop first revised Jersey City’s Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) program. The centerpiece of the revamped PILOT program was a tiered-system under which the terms of available tax abatements (most notably the length of the abatement) are largely determined by the location of the project.
The latest iteration of Jersey City’s tax abatement policy retains the tiered structure, while making minor tweaks to the policy. As set forth in Executive Order 2015-007, the revised program is intended to build on the success of the current PILOT program and instill greater transparency, objectivity, uniformity and predictability and to better employ the program’s incentives to meet the city’s strategic goals. Notably, the revised tax abatement revolves around a new tier map. The first three tiers incorporate the latest income data gathered by the city, while the expanded fourth tier includes areas in the city most in need of development.
In an effort to leverage the economic activity that is taking place in Jersey City, the amended tax abatement policy includes new affordable housing requirements and incentives. In the most sought after Tier 1, developers seeking abatements are required to set aside 10 percent of the total number of units for moderate-income housing, which is defined as housing available to households earning at or below 80 percent of the area median income. Alternatively, developers can make a contribution to the city’s affordable housing trust fund. Developers in the other tiers can further extend their tax-abatement terms by up to ten years by committing to construct affordable units or by making a voluntary contribution to the affordable trust fund.
Under the new tax abatement policy, the annual service charges increased slightly. Below is a brief summary of the new service charge levels provided by Jersey City:
| Tax Tier | Term | Annual City Service Charge | Annual County Service Charge | Administrative Cost Charge |
| Tier 1 | 10 years | 13% annual gross revenues | 5% of annual City service charge | 2% of annual City service charge |
| Tier 2 | 10 years | 12% annual gross revenues | 5% of annual City service charge | 2% of annual City service charge |
| Tier 3 | 20 years | 11% annual gross revenues | 5% of annual City service charge | 2% of annual City service charge |
| Tier 4 | 30 years | 10% annual gross revenues | 5% of annual City service charge | 2% of annual City service charge |
The revised policies and procedures apply to future long term PILOTs and related financial agreements. To determine how the new tax abatement policy may impact your project, it is advisable to consult with an experienced New Jersey attorney.
Donald M. Pepe
dpepe@scarincihollenbeck.com
About Donald M. Pepe
Donald M. Pepe devotes his practice to all aspects of complex real estate development and real estate transactional work with an emphasis on retail and residential development.
Related Article:
The Tax Abatement Process in Jersey City, NJ: The Basics
Long-Term Tax Abatements In New Jersey
Tax Abatement Attorney In Jersey City, NJ
How To File A Five-Year tax Abatement In New Jersey
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!