Robert E. Levy
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comFirm Insights
NJ Court Rules Building Owner Not Responsible for Safety of Water Supply
Author: Robert E. Levy
Date: June 19, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
New Jersey’s Appellate Division recently ruled that a building owner could not be held liable when an employee contracted Legionnaires’ disease from the building’s water supply. The case, Vellucci v. Allstate Insurance Company, offers an interesting discussion of the legal responsibilities of a New Jersey commercial property owner.
The Facts of the Case
Albert D. Vellucci was employed by Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) in an office located in a commercial office building in the Township of Bridgewater. The building was owned, designed, built, and managed by defendant Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. (Mack-Cali). Plaintiff Anthony Vellucci filed a wrongful death lawsuit on behalf of his late father alleging that he contracted Legionnaires’ disease in December 2004 when he was exposed to a water borne pathogen in the building’s water supply system. The plaintiff also sued New Jersey American Water Co., Inc., the building’s water supplier.
After the trial court dismissed the case on summary judgment, the plaintiff appealed. As summarized by the Appellate Division, the plaintiff argued on appeal that Mack-Cali, as a sophisticated owner and manager of commercial properties, had a duty to maintain the building’s water supply and plumbing system in a reasonably safe condition, including taking affirmative measures to detect the presence of the Legionella bacteria.
The Court’s Decision
The Appellate Division disagreed, concluding that the building owner did not have an affirmative duty to test the building’s water supply for bacteria. As explained by the court, “Absent evidence that Mack-Cali actually knew or should have known, through the exercise of reasonable maintenance measures, that the building’s water supply had been contaminated with the Legionella bacteria, Mack-Cali is not liable for decedent’s demise.”
The court rejected the plaintiff’s argument that large, commercial landlords should be held liable because they are in the best position to prevent what can amount to substantial harm. Rather, the court noted that there is no statutory or regulatory scheme imposing a duty on owners and managers of commercial office buildings to take affirmative action to detect the presence of Legionella.
“There are no industry standards that required Mack-Cali to have done anything more than what it did in response to the salient facts of this case,” the court concluded.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Robert Levy, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
NJ Court Rules Building Owner Not Responsible for Safety of Water Supply
Author: Robert E. Levy
New Jersey’s Appellate Division recently ruled that a building owner could not be held liable when an employee contracted Legionnaires’ disease from the building’s water supply. The case, Vellucci v. Allstate Insurance Company, offers an interesting discussion of the legal responsibilities of a New Jersey commercial property owner.
The Facts of the Case
Albert D. Vellucci was employed by Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) in an office located in a commercial office building in the Township of Bridgewater. The building was owned, designed, built, and managed by defendant Mack-Cali Realty, L.P. (Mack-Cali). Plaintiff Anthony Vellucci filed a wrongful death lawsuit on behalf of his late father alleging that he contracted Legionnaires’ disease in December 2004 when he was exposed to a water borne pathogen in the building’s water supply system. The plaintiff also sued New Jersey American Water Co., Inc., the building’s water supplier.
After the trial court dismissed the case on summary judgment, the plaintiff appealed. As summarized by the Appellate Division, the plaintiff argued on appeal that Mack-Cali, as a sophisticated owner and manager of commercial properties, had a duty to maintain the building’s water supply and plumbing system in a reasonably safe condition, including taking affirmative measures to detect the presence of the Legionella bacteria.
The Court’s Decision
The Appellate Division disagreed, concluding that the building owner did not have an affirmative duty to test the building’s water supply for bacteria. As explained by the court, “Absent evidence that Mack-Cali actually knew or should have known, through the exercise of reasonable maintenance measures, that the building’s water supply had been contaminated with the Legionella bacteria, Mack-Cali is not liable for decedent’s demise.”
The court rejected the plaintiff’s argument that large, commercial landlords should be held liable because they are in the best position to prevent what can amount to substantial harm. Rather, the court noted that there is no statutory or regulatory scheme imposing a duty on owners and managers of commercial office buildings to take affirmative action to detect the presence of Legionella.
“There are no industry standards that required Mack-Cali to have done anything more than what it did in response to the salient facts of this case,” the court concluded.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Robert Levy, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.