James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
New Tax For Finance Firms Proposed By Obama
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: February 3, 2015
Key Contacts
Back
Pres. Barack Obama proposed a new tax on financial institutions during his State of the Union Address earlier in January.
The new tax policy, which would levy a seven-point basis fee on the total liabilities of roughly 100 financial firms with more than $50 billion in assets, would generate an estimated $110 billion in tax revenue over the course of 10 years, according to Bloomberg.
Broader approach
While the president suggested a similar tax in the past, the new policy would affect a broader array of financial institutions such as insurance companies and asset managers, a senior administration official told the news source. Because of this more expansive tax base, the new proposal would raise around twice as much money while at the same time imposing a lower rate on industry participants.
The financial institutions that would need to pay this new tax fall under the description of “too big too fail,” meaning that their vast size provides them with both lower borrowing costs and also insurance that they will receive bailout money if needed, since their dissolution could help trigger the financial system’s collapse, noted Forbes contributor Tim Worstall.
While their key role ensures these financial institutions receive protection from the federal government, these companies are not actively paying for their insurance, stated Worstall, who currently serves as a fellow at the Adam Smith Institute and has published in a wide range of venues.
Managing risk
While the average taxpayer might feel comfort that the largest U.S. banks are insulated from failing completely, they might not be so enthused if they need to foot the bill. This taxpayer might be happy to know that many predict the new policy could give major banks less incentive to take big risks, CNNMoney reported.
The White House has stated that the proposed tax would “make it more costly for the largest financial firms to finance their activities by borrowing heavily,” according to the news source. However, there are some fine points that need to be clarified. While the proposal stated it would affect liabilities, simply targeting all liabilities could prompt banks to originate fewer loans.
Moving forward
Obama has indicated that if he succeeded in obtaining the tax revenue from this proposal, he would use the money to expand tax benefits that would affect the middle class, including credits for child care and higher education, Bloomberg reported. These efforts dovetail with his recently announced plans to work with Congress to provide community college education free to millions of students.
“What you’re seeing here is really dedicated middle-class tax relief to really get at that problem of middle-class wage stagnation,” stated Harry Stein, who works with the Center for American Progress as the director of fiscal policy, according to the news source.
- Practices: Tax, Trusts & Estates
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
New Tax For Finance Firms Proposed By Obama
Author: James F. McDonough
Pres. Barack Obama proposed a new tax on financial institutions during his State of the Union Address earlier in January.
The new tax policy, which would levy a seven-point basis fee on the total liabilities of roughly 100 financial firms with more than $50 billion in assets, would generate an estimated $110 billion in tax revenue over the course of 10 years, according to Bloomberg.
Broader approach
While the president suggested a similar tax in the past, the new policy would affect a broader array of financial institutions such as insurance companies and asset managers, a senior administration official told the news source. Because of this more expansive tax base, the new proposal would raise around twice as much money while at the same time imposing a lower rate on industry participants.
The financial institutions that would need to pay this new tax fall under the description of “too big too fail,” meaning that their vast size provides them with both lower borrowing costs and also insurance that they will receive bailout money if needed, since their dissolution could help trigger the financial system’s collapse, noted Forbes contributor Tim Worstall.
While their key role ensures these financial institutions receive protection from the federal government, these companies are not actively paying for their insurance, stated Worstall, who currently serves as a fellow at the Adam Smith Institute and has published in a wide range of venues.
Managing risk
While the average taxpayer might feel comfort that the largest U.S. banks are insulated from failing completely, they might not be so enthused if they need to foot the bill. This taxpayer might be happy to know that many predict the new policy could give major banks less incentive to take big risks, CNNMoney reported.
The White House has stated that the proposed tax would “make it more costly for the largest financial firms to finance their activities by borrowing heavily,” according to the news source. However, there are some fine points that need to be clarified. While the proposal stated it would affect liabilities, simply targeting all liabilities could prompt banks to originate fewer loans.
Moving forward
Obama has indicated that if he succeeded in obtaining the tax revenue from this proposal, he would use the money to expand tax benefits that would affect the middle class, including credits for child care and higher education, Bloomberg reported. These efforts dovetail with his recently announced plans to work with Congress to provide community college education free to millions of students.
“What you’re seeing here is really dedicated middle-class tax relief to really get at that problem of middle-class wage stagnation,” stated Harry Stein, who works with the Center for American Progress as the director of fiscal policy, according to the news source.