Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 2, 2021
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
Gov. Phil Murphy recently signed legislation into law authorizing corporations to utilize electronic networks, including distributed electronic networks or databases that utilize blockchain technology, administered by or on the behalf of the corporation, in order to meet recordkeeping requirements. The provisions of the legislation (A-1178/S-898) took effect immediately.
“We need to use the technology at our disposal to ensure our information is safe,” said Assemblyman Christopher DePhillips (R-40), a co-sponsor of the legislation. “Permitting companies to use blockchain not only helps protect the company’s data but allows for full transparency of that data. Large companies like Microsoft and Walmart have embraced this technology and we need to make this available to all companies, not just big box stores.”
In basic terms, blockchain is a type of database that maintains a continuously-growing list of transactions. Due to the method in which a blockchain is structured when operated in a decentralized nature, the system creates an irreversible timeline of data. Thus, it is protected against revision by publicly-verifiable open-source cryptographic algorithms and immune to data loss through distributed records sharing.
While blockchain gained notoriety as the backbone of Bitcoin, its potential uses extend to numerous financial and commercial transactions. Proponents of blockchain technology maintain that, compared to a traditional, centralized database, it can result in lower risk, decreased operational costs, and greater efficiency.
With regard to corporate records, blockchain technology can simplify the process of storing records and managing revisions, while also protecting against the hacking of sensitive information. It also establishes a clear audit trail without the need for any intermediaries.
New Jersey is not the first state to allow corporations to take advantage of blockchain technology. Delaware was one of the first states in the country to adopt blockchain-friendly corporate laws. The state authorizes corporations to use the technology to maintain shareholder lists, as well as other corporate records. Delaware has also launched several pilot projects that are testing how to use blockchain to collect, record, and store corporate and government filings.
Under New Jersey law, corporations are required to keep records containing the names and addresses of all shareholders, the number, class and series of shares held by each and the dates when they respectively became the owners of the shares. The new law provides that these corporate records of shares may be kept on an electronic network, which is defined as “one or more electronic networks or databases, including one or more distributed electronic networks or databases that utilize blockchain technology, administered by or on the behalf of the corporation.” A-1178/S-898 also provides that corporations may use electronic transmissions from electronic networks to meet with certain notice provisions of existing law.
States like New Jersey are beginning to recognize that blockchain’s utility is not restricted to cryptocurrency. However, before utilizing blockchain technology for business purposes, we encourage corporations to consult with experienced legal counsel who can help weigh all of the potential risks and benefits and legal requirements.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Zachary Klein, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

As battery energy storage system (BESS) projects move from planning to construction, developers and property owners must address an issue that extends well beyond zoning approvals and interconnection agreements: what happens when something goes wrong? To avoid unforeseen liability, developers should address fire code compliance, emergency response planning, contractual risk allocation, and environmental liability before […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!